@colleenyoung
I had my second opinion and he thought my doctor’s plan was reasonable, but wanted me to think about some other things. The cancer in my lymph nodes was 2.5 mm in size. Guideline state that if the cancer is over 2 mm, the lymph nodes should be removed. With mine being so close to that size, I am in a gray area. If the lymph nodes were removed, and there was no additional cancer found, it would be reasonable to not have radiation in that area.
Then, he said his practice is no longer recommending radiation of the vulva, especially if the margins are greater than 2 mm. I reminded him that mine is less than 1 mm and he’s still recommended no radiation. He said I would be monitored, and if I had a reoccurrence, I would be able to have further surgery. If I had radiation, further surgery is not an option. I left that appointment with my head spinning.

The next day, I saw the radiology oncologist. He felt my original doctor’s plan was a good one, but was wondering why we were not removing the lymph nodes. He brought up the guidelines and said if you strictly go by them, that’s what he would recommend. Also, he said that if the lymph nodes were removed, and no cancer was found, he would still strongly recommend radiating the lymph area. He was not in favor of not radiating the vulvar area. He explained there were in situ cancer cells less than a millimeter away from the edge of my incision. He said chances are that there were additional cells across the margin. But, I left that appointment feeling more comfortable with any decision that I made.

After considering everything, I kept going back to the original plan as my favored one. My small cancer free margin made me very concerned about not radiating the vulva. Also, I am very worried about getting lymphedema and don’t want to take out my lymph nodes if it’s not absolutely necessary.

I saw my oncologist Tuesday after he had had a chance to speak with the oncologist at the James. They came to a meeting of the minds that landed on the original plan of not removing the lymph nodes, but radiating the groin and vulva.
He explained that if we didn’t radiate the vulva and I had a reoccurrence, surgery would not be a good option. A reoccurrence would likely be near my urethra and only radical surgery could be done and that would leave me unable to urinate normally.
He did not feel that removing the lymph nodes would be of much benefit, but would greatly increase my chance of lymphedema to around 60%. I have two other risk factors for lymphedema. The first one is that I had significant swelling after the sentinel lymph nodes were removed. The second is that I have varicose veins.
I felt relief that he had not changed his ideas, and he was able to change the mind of the oncologist at the James. He explained it in a way that made me feel comfortable with this plan. It seems that this option gives me a good chance of getting rid of the cancer with less damage to my body. So, that’s what I’m going with.

Thank you so much for your comment.