← Return to Can a low MAC culture count go away without antibiotics ?

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for bayarea58 @bayarea58

@sueinmn I wasn’t commenting on the wisdom of watchful waiting, only speaking to spontaneous conversion rates. Many patients who watchful wait never spontaneously convert, but also never develop disease to a point where treatment with antibiotics is necessary for them. I am sure they see that as a win regardless. As for the specific topic of spontaneous conversion rates, I think it’s a matter of going to the source data and reading that carefully. I see now the discussion in @pacathy’s linked article, but the source material does not say what the article says. It’s like a game of scientific telephone. The study you link doesn’t seem to address spontaneous conversion at all. Maybe you accidentally linked the wrong thing. In any event, I stand by my original statement that disease progression, or the lack thereof, seems to have everything to do with one’s odds of spontaneous conversion. And many factors influence each individual’s risk of progression. If anyone is interested in reading more about the factors influencing their specific risk of progression start with the studies underlying the 2020 treating guidelines. And of course, talk to your medical team.

Jump to this post


Replies to "@sueinmn I wasn’t commenting on the wisdom of watchful waiting, only speaking to spontaneous conversion rates...."

@bayarea58 I didn’t link the wrong article. The quote is about the third sentence under the heading “Natural course….” early in article.

With another body part wanting time and care these days, I don’t have time to do a deep dive, but quickly looked at #26 from European Respiratory Journal on natural progression listed immediately after the sentence quoted and it stated a 51% rate.

These are about 8-10 years old (things change) and the first 2 sources authors quote seem limited to just the MAC species per the titles.