← Return to Nearing decision time: what treatment?

Discussion
TommyG avatar

Nearing decision time: what treatment?

Prostate Cancer | Last Active: Jun 13 7:49am | Replies (9)

Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for Jeff Marchi @jeffmarc

I suppose you’ve already been told that they won’t do radiation because your prostate is so large. As a result, your decision to do The ablation will probably reduce the size of the prostate so they can actually treat it with Radiation or focal therapy. I was at a recent UCSF conference where they talked about results of Hifu. The biggest problem was reoccurrence in over 54% of the cases, you are grade group 2 so there is a better result expected.. Hifu leads you to be able to have radiation next, a real benefit. Here’s some information from that conference.

Af the UCSF prostate cancer forum on 4-17-26 Dr. Cooperberg had slides with this information

UCSF Results: first 135 HIFU patients

• 54% recurrence (41% in-field)

• 4% progression by 1 year, 16% overall

• IPSS (urinary obstruction) 6 before, 6 after

• SHIM (erection function) 16 before, 13 after (p=0.11)

• Major drivers of recurrence: GG3, high Decipher

Trade-offs

• Overall focal therapy is associated with minor side effects, but high rates of recurrence

• Inadequate energy delivery?

• Inadequate field of treatment?

• New cancer development?

• Others?

• Understanding the high recurrence rates and trying to improve them is a major area of research focus.

• Focal therapy does not burn bridges: RP, RT, even additional focal therapy are possible if necessary

Summary thoughts

•Focal ablation has a growing role for very carefully selected cases.

• Side effects rates are low but recurrence rates are high. GG3 and high Decipher are warning signs, as are high PSAD and bilateral disease.

• Focal therapy is an adjunct to active surveillance; additional treatment may well be needed down the road, but these treatments are still possible after focal.

University of California Consensus

1 Focal therapy must be acknowledged to be investigational

2. Focal therapy should be done under trial or research protocols as much as possible

3. Candidates should have at least 10 year life expectancy, GG2 or low-volume GG3, stage T1 or 2, and PSA < 10 or PSA < 20 and PSAD
< 0.15

4. Candidates need an MRI-guided confirmatory biopsy before treatment

5. Follow-up biopsy at 12 months is essential

Jump to this post


Replies to "I suppose you’ve already been told that they won’t do radiation because your prostate is so..."

@jeffmarc Thanks, Jeff. You are right about my thinking post hi-fu. Most docs rule out most treatments because of my prostate size. Right now, EBRT has been suggested by one RO but he also says it would be much more effective if my prostate were smaller. Some kind of ablation will also address BPH symptoms and pre-empt possible post treatment urination issues. I'm not experiencing any significant BPH-related problems, but those too are down the road if I don't address the issue.