I asked AI about this article and it looked it up for me. It pointed out the weaknesses of the article and that the research took place in the 90's when there were much less treatments (Tamoxafin) and surgeries. In addition, it reassured me that my Graves was not a factor since I had an ablation and my thyroid levels are managed with Levoxyl and kept within good and normal levels. I think my current breast cancer and osteoperosis concerns are more related to tumor size, Oncotype score, Receptor status, stage 3, surgery, chemo, radiation Bone status is what is driving my attention and I will continue to concentrate on the fact that I had no node involvement and lumpectomy, chemo (Oncotype 43) radiation and on Anastrozole while monitoring every 6 months with onco and mammo and now 3 years out with no recurrence is the best thing to work on with the cancer side and the Prolia for another couple of years followed by oral for a year or two along with DEXA that could change that plan. When consulting AI about actual reporting of Prolia side effects I got the true percentages and they seem reasonable, although you have to ask for present actual percentages and not the side effect percentages reported while research for approval was going on since there is an increased incidence of back pain that was not included in the initial finding. Thanks for the article. It actually encouraged me after I researched it, and got rid of the scary part of the title.