← Return to Biopsy recommended, is this correct next step?

Discussion
stevemcdonald avatar

Biopsy recommended, is this correct next step?

Prostate Cancer | Last Active: May 29 3:44pm | Replies (26)

Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for copyman @copyman

I disagree about biopsies not being a big deal. I feel biopsies are barbaric, especially when so many are done unnecessarily. Plus if done transrectal there is always a chance of infection. And if a blind biopsy it can be even more useless. Personally I would not have a biopsy done unless something showed on MRI. As mentioned there are other blood tests to detect prostate cancer and would do these before a blind biopsy.

Jump to this post


Replies to "I disagree about biopsies not being a big deal. I feel biopsies are barbaric, especially when..."

@copyman
I had three transrectal biopsies 16 years ago. They were a little uncomfortable, but not a big deal. They didn’t do MRIs back then. They did do a CT scan before the third one and then did it to make sure I didn’t have Seminal vesicle invasion.

I definitely wouldn’t call it barbaric. Much better today that they have guided biopsies after an MRI.