← Return to What to do when pulmonologist is passive?
DiscussionWhat to do when pulmonologist is passive?
MAC & Bronchiectasis | Last Active: 6 hours ago | Replies (32)Comment receiving replies
Replies to "@sueinmn Not to split hairs or raise a red flag but Bronchiectasis is no longer considered..."
Connect

@scoop It might not be "rare" in prevalence, but treatment knowledge and experience does not seem to be increasing as fast as one would hope.
Like you, I hope that "..."theoretically more pulmonologists will become familiar with the disease and include it in their differential diagnosis...'' I plan to talk to my pulmonologist about how she/we can help advance knowledge and recognition. With the use of diagnostic tools, there should be a way to get there.
But once recognized, the key is to be current with best practices & treatment protocols. My Fear is the recognition may be there, but the people with up-to-date skills will not.
Just to get a picture of totals, based on numbers from the Lung Association, the Asthma and Allergy Foundation, and bronchiectasisinfo.org:
Bronchiectasis 600,000 people (based on increasing awareness/diagnosis) or .18% of people,
COPD 11,100,000 or 3.3% of people, and Asthma 28,200,000 or 8% of people
That means the pulmonologist is 18 times more likely to see people with COPD and 450+ times more likely to see people with Asthma than people with Bronchiectasis.
Where will their treatment knowledge and expertise be the greatest?