Connect
← Return to Post-treatment testosterone
Discussion
Prostate Cancer | Last Active: May 11 11:37am | Replies (14)
Comment receiving replies
@northoftheborder Yup. And beyond monitoring, ALL of those potential side-effects of low T are manageable with a proactive approach to exercise, diet, calcium supplementation, and the miracle-male drugs. As for the 260s being "low T", I think it's kind of at the low end of normal.
Replies to "@northoftheborder Yup. And beyond monitoring, ALL of those potential side-effects of low T are manageable with..."
Connect
@guybe | As for the 260s being "low T", I think it's kind of at the low end of normal. |
This is the part that confuses me. A chart I saw about T recovery post ADT showed only 50% recovery but they considered 350 to be recovery. Some places use 300 as low normal. The Orgovyx web site considers 280 to be recovery and I assumed they fiddled with the numbers to make themselves look better. The test at my cancer center uses 300 but the urologist I went to see for a different opinion said 250 is low normal. The ads I constantly get tell me 800 is optimal but that seems like the high end of the scale. I guess that's why the urologist said to go by how I feel more than a specific number.