← Return to ARPI use after radiation treatment may be an issue

Discussion
Jeff Marchi avatar

ARPI use after radiation treatment may be an issue

Prostate Cancer | Last Active: 14 hours ago | Replies (41)

Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for northoftheborder @northoftheborder

@klein505 The phase III TITAN trial in 2018 demonstrated Apalutamide's effectiveness with ADT (doublet therapy) for treating mCSPC, and is the basis of its regulatory approval for that in the U.S., Canada, and elsewhere.

The ARANOTE trial, which concluded in late 2024, demonstrated the same thing for Darolutamide, but might be too recent to have made it through regulatory approval yet.

On the bright side, no trial has demonstrated that Apalutamide has any more side-effects than Darolutamide — the difference is purely theoretical and anecdotal at this point.

One retrospective study suggested that Apalutamide actually has *fewer* side-effects than Darolutamide, but it's even less reliable than most retrospective studies, so I wouldn't read too much into that.

Jump to this post


Replies to "@klein505 The phase III TITAN trial in 2018 demonstrated Apalutamide's effectiveness with ADT (doublet therapy) for..."

@northoftheborder
Bayer sued Johnson and Johnson over its claims that Erleada patients with CSPC lived longer than those that took Nubeqa.

Bayer Claims the study was biased.

Available comparative data indicates that Nubeqa generally has a more favorable safety profile, particularly regarding fatigue, falls, and rash.
Journal of Hematology Oncology Pharmacy

Lots of differences of opinion.

@northoftheborder Thank you! Would have taken me hours and hours to find those.
Lol, Just when I think there can't be anymore named trials, here are two more to read :):)