← Return to Considering Tulsa Pro or Proton radiation (full gland)

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for jaygk @jaygk

@toolbelt thanks so much. I am 66 years old. Which is probably why the consult didn’t recommend it. The only reason I considered it was I have less than 5% of grade group 5 my prostate is very small at 22 mL and it seems like Tulsa pro lend itself to more available. Repeat treatment treatments but I certainly see your point.

Jump to this post


Replies to "@toolbelt thanks so much. I am 66 years old. Which is probably why the consult didn’t..."

@jaygk Thanks. Given your age I think some sort of radiation is appropriate.
Look at my profile here and at
https://www.inspire.com/m/Toolbelt/posts/
to read about my SBRT treatment of 4+3 with Decipher of .81.