← Return to Considering Tulsa Pro or Proton radiation (full gland)

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for Jeff Marchi @jeffmarc

Here are some information and recommendations from doctors that are at locations that do focal therapy like TulsaPRO. In your case, I think they would tell you to avoid focal therapy completely.

At the 11/1/2025 PCRI conference the following was said by Matthew R. Cooperberg, MD, MPH Urologic Oncologist UCSF

What about focal therapy?
* The energy modality matters much less than the accuracy of the imaging - which is not there yet.
* Overall focal therapy is associated with minor side effects, but high rates of recurrence both in- and out-of-field.
* Focal therapy is not really a replacement for surgery or radiation; it is better considered an adjunct to active surveillance

Af the UCSF prostate cancer forum on 4-17-26 Dr. Cooperberg had slides with this information

UCSF Results: first 135 HIFU patients

• 54% recurrence (41% in-field)

• 4% progression by 1 year, 16% overall

• IPSS (urinary obstruction) 6 before, 6 after

• SHIM (erection function) 16 before, 13 after (p=0.11)

• Major drivers of recurrence: GG3, high Decipher

Trade-offs

• Overall focal therapy is associated with minor side effects, but high rates of recurrence

• Inadequate energy delivery?

• Inadequate field of treatment?

• New cancer development?

• Others?

• Understanding the high recurrence rates and trying to improve them is a major area of research focus.

• Focal therapy does not burn bridges: RP, RT, even additional focal therapy are possible if necessary

Summary thoughts

•Focal ablation has a growing role for very carefully selected cases.

• Side effects rates are low but recurrence rates are high. GG3 and high Decipher are warning signs, as are high PSAD and bilateral disease.

• Focal therapy is an adjunct to active surveillance; additional treatment may well be needed down the road, but these treatments are still possible after focal.

University of California Consensus

1 Focal therapy must be acknowledged to be investigational

2. Focal therapy should be done under trial or research protocols as much as possible

3. Candidates should have at least 10 year life expectancy, GG2 or low-volume GG3, stage T1 or 2, and PSA < 10 or PSA < 20 and PSAD
< 0.15

4. Candidates need an MRI-guided confirmatory biopsy before treatment

5. Follow-up biopsy at 12 months is essential

Jump to this post


Replies to "Here are some information and recommendations from doctors that are at locations that do focal therapy..."

@jeffmarc Jeff. Thank you very much. I am 66 years old. My PSA is 5.99. And I am sending my 3+5 = 8 biopsy sample out for another decipher test.

The only reason I even considered Tulsa pro is due to my less than 5% of grade group 5. It will be interesting to see what my decipher is on this sample and whether that impacts my decision on continuing with Tulsa pro consult or just dropping it.

I’m leaning towards the university of Cincinnati 28 session of proton therapy using a Varian cyclotron proton instrument with a gantry.
I’m considering a 28 sessions of proton versus five session SPRT or 28 session I MRT to keep bleed over of the rectum at a minimum. Especially with my diverticulosis and polyps.

Of course I will use the SpaceOar gel.