← Return to Devastated by support group meeting: I'm doing everything wrong

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for capatov @capatov

When my urologist explained the post procedural external drains, extended foley catheter and fairly high incidence of impotence and incontinence...I opted for IMRT, HDR and six months of ADT.

My research suggests surgery and radiation treatment regimens have very similar outcomes. I think Dr Scholz feels that few of us should opt for surgery as radiation has gotten so much better over time.

Jump to this post


Replies to "When my urologist explained the post procedural external drains, extended foley catheter and fairly high incidence..."

@capatov Radiation has dramatically changed over the years. My daughter is a family practice doctor and she sees lots of people that had radiation a long time ago and the side effects from the less targeted approaches. The new approaches are so much better.

@capatov "the post procedural external drains, extended foley catheter and fairly high incidence of impotence and incontinence"

In my opinion, the first two are the same for everyone with a competent surgeon. In my case, they were a minor annoyance that did not interfere with my daily activities during the brief period I wore them. I don't understand the aversion.

In my opinion, the last two are highly variable for each person. In my case, I elected impotence (nerve-sparing) surgery beforehand, & was not incontinent afterwards. But as I said, this part varies between persons, & I highly understand the aversion.