← Return to Devastated by support group meeting: I'm doing everything wrong

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for Jeff Marchi @jeffmarc

@fritzo
I was at the UCSF conference today and Dr. Cooperberg gave a talk about focal therapy

He said this in November

At the 11/1/2025 PCRI conference the following was said by Matthew R. Cooperberg, MD, MPH Urologic Oncologist UCSF

What about focal therapy?
* The energy modality matters much less than the accuracy of the imaging - which is not there yet.
* Overall focal therapy is associated with minor side effects, but high rates of recurrence both in- and out-of-field.
* Focal therapy is not really a replacement for surgery or radiation; it is better considered an adjunct to active surveillance

He reinforced it today. He felt that people who had more than a 4+3 or had lesions in both sides of their prostate should not even consider it. Here’s a bunch of information from his today’s presentation.

Some information from today’s slides

UCSF Results: first 135 HIFU patients
• 54% recurrence (41% in-field)
• 4% progression by 1 year, 16% overall
• IPSS (urinary obstruction) 6 before, 6 after
• SHIM (erection function) 16 before, 13 after (p=0.11)
• Major drivers of recurrence: GG3, high Decipher

Trade-offs
• Overall focal therapy is associated with minor side effects, but high rates of recurrence
• Inadequate energy delivery?
• Inadequate field of treatment?
• New cancer development?
• Others?
• Understanding the high recurrence rates and trying to improve them is a major area of research focus.
• Focal therapy does not burn bridges: RP, RT, even additional focal therapy are possible if necessary

Summary thoughts
•Focal ablation has a growing role for very carefully selected cases.
• Side effects rates are low but recurrence rates are high. GG3 and high Decipher are warning signs, as are high PSAD and bilateral disease.
• Focal therapy is an adjunct to active surveillance; additional treatment may well be needed down the road, but these treatments are still possible after focal.

University of California Consensus
1. Focal therapy must be acknowledged to be investigational
2. Focal therapy should be done under trial or research protocols as much as possible
3. Candidates should have at least 10 year life expectancy, GG2 or low-volume GG3, stage T1 or 2, and PSA < 10 or PSA < 20 and PSAD
< 0.15
4. Candidates need an MRI-guided confirmatory biopsy before treatment
5. Follow-up biopsy at 12 months is essential

Jump to this post


Replies to "@fritzo I was at the UCSF conference today and Dr. Cooperberg gave a talk about focal..."

@jeffmarc Wow-this confirms all of the things I was really concerned about.

Those recurrence figures are absolutely terrifying. It makes sense the UCSF only recommends it as an adjunct to surveillance or some very specific case.

Jeff-thank you so much for sharing all of this really impactful information. I feel much better about my decision process. Thank you again!

It makes me wonder why the presentation I watched by a center director portrayed such a dramatically different picture. If I had been presented this information, I would have not been upset at all.