Connect
← Return to Diagnosed Yesterday 04/14/26 - Gleason 9 treatment
Discussion
Diagnosed Yesterday 04/14/26 - Gleason 9 treatment
Prostate Cancer | Last Active: 14 hours ago | Replies (30)Comment receiving replies
If I was 54 when diagnosed, with a clean PSMA PET, I would choose RP every time. Unfortunately, I didn't get that choice, nor am I 54. (click on my blue name for complete profile)
As far as second opinions go, if you give a general location as to what part of the country you're in, we can steer you in the right direction. Unless you go with remote (not a fan, I like looking the doc in the eye) Or you can check here: https://www.nccn.org/home/member-institutions
Best wishes.
Replies to "If I was 54 when diagnosed, with a clean PSMA PET, I would choose RP every..."
Connect
@mjp0512
Hello, thank you very much for your reply. I appreciate your time and every word.
Due to my location and commitments I cannot travel in the near future so I would like to get a second opinion remotely. I have all the labs, mri, biopsy, etc files along with Doctor consultations and notes. I do not have the biopsy slides. Also the slides were sent out for genomic testing I believe. I may be able to get additional information but I just received these files last night.
What is the gold standard for remote second opinion in your opinion? JH, UCSF? Not sure where to look.
Again many thanks for your time