I have a question about seeking a 2nd opinion. While I still have not received my decipher score yet (due within a week or two) and therefore no final recommendation from my urologist as to treatment recommendations I wanted to get a 2nd opinion appt "on the books" so I could get in sooner rather than later. What I have found is that the process of getting into Abramson Cancer Center at UPENN is to schedule seeing a particular doctor in a particular discipline and asked me who I wanted to see, which of course I didn't know the answer. Their protocol was to steer someone my age to Radiation Oncology rather than Surgery. They said they could get all my testing data online and said they didn't need my actual biopsy slides for the appt, the written report would suffice. I was assuming they would want all the primary testing materials so they could make their decision based on their analysis of my test materials. Does this sound right or do I need to be more specific about what I want out of second opinion. I'm hoping to learn whether I am a candidate for focal therapies or not and if not what specific type of radiation protocol is recommended. Or is their recommendation Active Surveillance. Does this process sound correct? Are there any other things I should be doing to make sure the 2nd opinion is with the right person? As always thank for this groups thoughts.