← Return to TULSA PRO Results at 3 plus years - Treated for High Grade Gleason 8

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for russm @russm

@bens1 That isn't quite accurate...there are some early updates...but, it will take a period of time for the "conclusions" to be reached. I have learned some things that aren't official, but it is positive for TULSA. Below is a link to a video update that was released a few weeks ago...

Jump to this post


Replies to "@bens1 That isn't quite accurate...there are some early updates...but, it will take a period of time..."

@russm
Thanks for the video. For me, if had a biological re-occurrence, 6 months of data would not be enough for me to say, lets do it. I thought it was positive that NCCN has included tulsa pro in their 2025 guidelines but to me, I read the discussions as more data by the end of the year would shed additional light on both its effectiveness, it being more likely to be recommended by doctors and increased acceptance by insurance companies and investors. I think it is a great step in the right direction as a viable option.