PSA detected after salvage radiation and prostectomy
In 2014, husband had prostectomy at age 63. Gleason was 7. Followup PSA tests undetectable until May 2023 at .13. Referred to Radiology Oncologist and PSA monitored regularly with increase up to .24 in Sept. 2024. Decipher score low and nothing showed on PSMA scans. A Biochemical recurrence. He did 7 weeks of radiation in fall 2024. First PSA retest in May 2025 was undetectable. Retest this month with .11 PSA. Very surprised, disappointed and scared. RO has scheduled another PSMA scan in late January, along with PSA test. Said some cells outside of radiation area could be producing the PSA. If PSMA shows that, more radiation might be warranted. If not looking at ADT. We will be meeting with his Radiation Oncologist and a medical oncologist at the January testing. Thinking will ask both Doctors if aware of any Clinic Trials, not sure if that is even something we should be considering at this point. We are at Mayo, so know getting excellent care. Just trying to research as much as I can before our January appointments. Would love to hear thoughts from others about this unfortunate journey.
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.
Connect

@restlessandwild just wondering if you retested yet, and what your results were?
@foreright late January increased to .13. Husband Retested again late March and decreased to .11. No ADT yet. Currently monitor mode. Seeing medical oncologist again in June. New scans scheduled for August.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
4 Reactions@aprapr good luck, I hope that downward trajectory continues
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
2 Reactions@foreright
Thanks for asking. Latest test was relief, it was under 0.1. Next test is in two months, so this will be properly monitored.
Im wondering, if exercise before my 0.1 test could affect the measure... at least I hope.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
3 ReactionsDid your husband's post-surgical pathology report reveal and detail any of the following:
1. Extraprostatic Extension (EPE) where the tumor broke through the membranous "capsule" of tissue that surrounds the prostate?
2. Surgical margins where cancerous cells were viewed microscopically right up to the edge (margin) of the tissue? That means that the cancer extended beyond what was removed...the urologist couldn't have know it, but (s)he left some cancerous tissue in your husband's body.
3. Seminal vesicle invasion of one or both seminal vesicles. Both were removed along with both vas deferens, but when the cancer is found in the seminal vesicle(s), it instantly takes you to the pT3b tumor classification, independent of the lower risk Gleason of 3+4=7. I know, because this was my reality. A pT3b cancer has a 25-50% probability of recurring "within" the first five years post op. My urologist said that in his practice 1 of 3 (33%) of his pT3b patient have recurrence "within" five years. I am hoping, praying, and counting on being in the 2/3 that don't have the recurrence.
The real pivot point for prostate cancer seems to be Extraprostatic Extension. Once the tumor breaks through the capsule, all bets are off because you don't know where it is spreading. The likely places are the seminal vesicle(s), and that is why they are removed in cautionary surgical practice. Sometimes the cancer spreads to the bladder neck, or lymph nodes that are close by.
I'll look for your reply. Good luck to you and your husband.
Hopefully there will be enough prostatic tissue for a PET Scan to see radioactive isotope (Gallium) uptake and where it is. Prostate cancer grows so slowly (most of the time) that your PSA can be detected, but there may not be enough cells to take up the Gallium isotope for the PET Scan to detect it.
Please reply back with whether your husband had any of the above (1-3).
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
3 Reactions@melvinw
\\Dr. Patrick Walsh’s ‘Surviving Prostate Cancer’
I was looking for the 5th edition of this book but couldn't find it. Do you by any chance have it?
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 Reaction@denis76 I have the 4th edition, but it looks like Amazon has the 5th edition.
@rlpostrp 1. No; 2 margins were clean. Have to check our notes for 3. Will get back to you on that when I can.