← Return to TAKE CHARGE of your prostate cancer and future - ASK QUESTIONS

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for diverjer @diverjer

Intraductal Carcinoma not mentioned in my pathology report, was 15 samples taken and 2 had what they said large Cribriform Glands. Five were 4+3 and 8 were 3+4, 3 were benign. PSMA Pet said all was confined to prostate.
MRI did say Prostatic capsule: Intact, Neurovascular bundles: Not involved, Seminal vesicles: Not involved, Lymph nodes: No lymphadenopathy, Bones: No acute osseous abnormality. The prostate gland measures 5.7 x 5.0 x 4.9 cm with volume of 68.75 cc. PSA density is 0.06 NG/mL/CC. 2. Lesion # 1: PI-, . No pelvic lymphadenopathy and what caused them to take biopsy-and RADS 5 lesion in the left posterior peripheral zone extending from the base to the apex measures 5.83 cc. No frank extracapsular
But nowhere mention Intraductal?? I guess that is good?
I may ask them to take a second look, but they seem to be getting tired of my questions. Then they sent them off for a decipher test (which came back .85), maybe they don't have them anymore?

Jump to this post


Replies to "Intraductal Carcinoma not mentioned in my pathology report, was 15 samples taken and 2 had what..."

@diverjer
That actually is really good. There is no known treatment to handle both intraductal and cribriform At the same time. I was really frustrated trying to find some documentation discussing treating both and there was nothing. Apparently, they have not found a successful treatment when both problems are found at the same time.