← Return to Radical Prostatectomy vs. Radiation therapy?

Discussion
pnutbarm avatar

Radical Prostatectomy vs. Radiation therapy?

Prostate Cancer | Last Active: Apr 21 7:39pm | Replies (52)

Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for jpfirststate @jpfirststate

I have watched this forum for a while but have never posted anything. So here goes. I am 63 years old now. My biopsy was 3+4=7 Gleason and PSA was 5.2 at diagnosis. In my case, I chose nerve-sparing robotic surgery over radiation when I had my initial treatment in 2018 and my PSA was < .1 for four years.
I did this because my Dad was treated with radiation for throat cancer years ago and when it came back, they said surgery was no longer an option. He died six months later after lots of chemo. The other factor for me was that surgery provided a clean benchmark for success: PSA should drop to near zero. Radiation meant a drop to some “nadir” and then they watch it from there. After surgery, other treatments - radiation, PET scans, and ADT - these are all still on the table as future options to control a recurrence.
I just completed radiation last fall after a biochemical recurrence when my PSA climbed back to .23 over 6-plus years. Now, 6 months later, it is thankfully down to .04 after dropping to .07 after 33 treatments and 6 months of Orgovyx (the pill form of ADT.)
I meet with my radiation oncologist on Monday. I had a Decipher score done at recurrence - not at original diagnosis - and it was in the high risk range. Although I wish I had known that at the beginning, I would have done exactly the same thing. At age 56 when I had surgery - relatively young in prostate treatment terms - I regained urinary and sexual function within a few months. The reason I got checked for my PSA since my 30s was that my Dad got prostate cancer around age 70 and got the “seeds” therapy. He didn’t die of prostate cancer but his experience shaped my choices. My urologist and I always agree that our goal is that I die from something else - maybe with, but NOT of, prostate cancer. There are so many new and emerging treatments that are very encouraging. But I know it is my job to stay active and focused on my treatment so I can have those extra years with my family and friends. The job and the hobbies and the vacations won’t be there if I’m not there. I also remember good advice from my high school teacher: “Don’t worry about making the right choice: make a choice and then make it right.”

Jump to this post


Replies to "I have watched this forum for a while but have never posted anything. So here goes...."

@jpfirststate
My father died of prostate cancer at 88. I remember when he told me Lupron stopped working. He had radiation as his initial treatment. I decided to have surgery since radiation didn’t work for him. 3 1/2 years later, it came back and I had radiation. Turns out I got BRCA2 from my mother, so my prostate cancer keeps coming back four total reoccurrence so far. Started this 16 years ago, however at 62.

The drugs we have today work really great. They have kept me alive 12 years after radiation. Prostate cancer has become a chronic disease for almost everyone not a deadly disease.

I am now on Orgovyx and Nubeqa it has kept me undetectable for 29 months.

Have you had hereditary, genetic testing? Having a father get prostate cancer more than doubles your chance of getting it, but is there something in your genetics that is causing you to get it young? My brother got it at 77 because he doesn’t have BRCA2 like I do.

You do want to get this genetic test because if you have a problem, your kids may have inherited it and they need to know there is a risk besides the fact that they have a high risk of prostate cancer.

@jpfirststate

Great information, especially like the "Don’t worry about making the right choice: make a choice and then make it right.”

Ray