← Return to Screening Method Discrepancies

Discussion
dmac70 avatar

Screening Method Discrepancies

Aortic Aneurysms | Last Active: Apr 6 7:33am | Replies (18)

Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for wanneram @wanneram

Hello,

On March 4th, an MRI scan of the blood vessels was performed (private clinic). The results showed that I had a dilation of the ascending aorta, measured at 47 mm.

On March 15th, I had an ultrasound (at another private clinic). The cardiologist saw a dilation of 40 mm, but given my height, age, and weight (190 cm / 115 kg and 53 y), this was not particularly unusual. Naturally, I was very surprised and also quite confused.

I contacted the hospital that performed the MRI and asked where this discrepancy came from, and the answer I received was the following: The MRI clearly shows that the dilation is larger than 40 mm, but the measurements can also deviate slightly.

This coming Saturday, I have another ultrasound at someone else's (private clinic), and on March 31st, I am going to the hospital for a very extensive examination based on the results of the first MRI scan. I will come back to the differences in the measurement results.

Jump to this post


Replies to "Hello, On March 4th, an MRI scan of the blood vessels was performed (private clinic). The..."

@wanneram
4.0 cm and 4.7 cm is a significant discrepancy. By ultrasound, do you mean echocardiogram?