← Return to Went in T2a, came out T3a — anyone else blindsided by post-op path?
DiscussionWent in T2a, came out T3a — anyone else blindsided by post-op path?
Prostate Cancer | Last Active: 2 days ago | Replies (29)Comment receiving replies
Replies to "Your story mirrors mine EXACTLY. I was a biopsied as a "barely" Gleason 3+4=7 with just..."
@rlpostrp Regarding his “perfect example of why he never does Active Surveillance.” And one never wants to rely on just one number.
This is actually the reason why active surveillance does not involve only monitoring PSA.
But, by including other tests to keep active surveillance truly “active,” one also monitors:
> % Free PSA
> PSA Doubling Time (or Velocity)
> genomic (biomarker) tests
> genetic (germline) test
> getting independent 2nd opinions, on all biopsies, scans, and images
With additional information, there is more insight as to whether something more serious is lurking unseen (rather than cutting first, just to see……).
Connect

@rlpostrp Gosh...I don't understand how biopsies can sometimes be so far from reality. Almost implausible to be that inaccurate.
I was not aware of these types of situations prior to reading the posts in this thread.