@grandpun

Thank you for your response.

In the age of capitalism, when people make money off sick people, I think this is pointless.

The main risk is resistance; it's the point of no return. Many of us, including myself, have no choice.

I already stated my arguments in the opening message.

In my opinion, statistical data processing is needed for those who survived.

I graduated from university and know what mathematical statistics is. I may be wrong, but my main assumption is that resistant cells are much more dangerous than cells that haven't yet become resistant.

Challenge #1: Identifying significant influencing factors rather than variables

Challenge #2: How to test assumptions over a long period of time

Challenge #3: How to develop assessment criteria and a response to changing dynamics (accurately assess how cancer responds and predict its behavior)

I believe that while our cells are hormone-dependent, there's a chance (metastases don't invade vital organs), but once they become resistant, all we can do is fight their growth, with almost no chance. In other words, wasting time is like shooting ourselves in the knee.

If our PSA is almost 0, then there are few cells and they're not yet resistant, but if the cells don't respond, there's no turning back.

Any risk must be considered in terms of probability and its proper assessment.