← Return to What if this prevents cancer from becoming resistant?
DiscussionWhat if this prevents cancer from becoming resistant?
Prostate Cancer | Last Active: 6 hours ago | Replies (41)Comment receiving replies
Replies to "If you go on ADT for a month, it could take three or four months before..."
Connect

@jeffmarc
Thanks, Jeff.
What if we repeat the combination for 2 or 3 months? And add an additional variation.
Look at this
Cycle 1
2 months - ADT only (decrease testosterone)
2 months - ADT + lutamide (decrease testosterone and reduce "ignition")
3 months - lutamide only (reduce "ignition" increase testosterone)
1 month - no ADT no lutamide ( "let cancer think that wall is no exist ")
Cycle 2
2 months - ADT + lutamide (decrease testosterone and reduce "ignition")
3 months - ADT only (decrease testosterone)
1 month - no ADT no lutamide ( "let cancer think is wall no exist ")
1 month - no ADT no lutamide ( "let cancer think that wall is no exist ") 2 months - lutamide only (reduce "ignition" increase testosterone)
Cycle 3
2 months - ADT + lutamide (decrease testosterone)
1 month - no ADT no lutamide ( "let cancer think that wall is no exist ")
2 months - lutamide only (reduce "ignition" increase testosterone)
3 months - ADT only (decrease testosterone)
....
Cycle 4 (New combination)
Each line can be linked to a PSA increase. As I already mentioned, if the increase is small, the lines are swapped; if the increase is significant, we increase "protection" by using both components over a longer period.
In other words, combinations should not be repeated.
You can consider varying the duration (2-3 months) depending on the Gleason level and PSA increase, and try to find a correlation. It's clear it will be nonlinear. For example, for those with a high Gleason level, they should not go without a moderate level of protection for 3 months (level = duration and combination of ADT and lutamide).