← Return to Mitral valve repair-Open Heart better?

Discussion
babheart avatar

Mitral valve repair-Open Heart better?

Heart & Blood Health | Last Active: Mar 2 11:20am | Replies (10)

Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for camaroyo @camaroyo

@babheart I had mitral valve replacement with a bovine valve in 2013 (pacemaker in 2012), and was open heart surgery . Overall came thru fine and lasted until 2024 when I had a replacement done thru the groin with an “aortic” valve (for the mitral / bovine valve). No issues with the surgeries just some adjustments with meds. As far as recoveries: open heart was somewhat more painful but definitely manageable but longer. Had to heal scar and had a heart pillow to hug when I coughed. The minimally invasive/thru groin, was no pain for me at all and quick healing. Hardest part was laying still for two hours after to insure I didn’t bleed. But not painful for me. If I have an option in the future I’ll. Choose thru the groin again. Home quick, healed quick and really no pain to speak of.
Had AFIb prior to open heart and none since. (I do have a pacemaker). And remember, mine was a full replacement, not a repair. Hope this helps you.

Jump to this post


Replies to "@babheart I had mitral valve replacement with a bovine valve in 2013 (pacemaker in 2012), and..."

@camaroyo thank you- that is helpful♥️

@camaroyo What you had was a transcatheter valve replacement. Minimally invasive is when they go between the ribs to access the heart as opposed to a thoracotomy, where they split your sternum to access the heart. It still requires bypass and I believe is still considered "open heart" surgery.