← Return to What is treatment for Gleason Score 8 at 80 years old in good health?

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for heavyphil @heavyphil

@rlpostrp I don’t know why your RO would make a statement like that, unless your PROSTOX test came back high risk. Then it ‘might’ have an advantage.
If it didn’t, he’s probably pushing Proton therapy for the hospital system he works for. Those machines are very, very expensive and after they are advocated and lobbied for by either the head of radiology, a board trustee or some other muckety-muck, you had better use it a lot!
Not saying there’s anything wrong with it, but its vast superiority to photon radiation seems a bit overblown.
Did you ever read anything positive about photonic radiation in an article advocating/describing proton beam?
They make photonic radiation seem medieval compared to space age photons; meanwhile photonic radiation has evolved tremendously and it is a far cry from the treatments of yesteryear. If you do a search for side effects of proton beam radiation, you will find the same SE’s listed as for photonic. Best,
Phil
Phil

Jump to this post


Replies to "@rlpostrp I don’t know why your RO would make a statement like that, unless your PROSTOX..."

@heavyphil All I needed to read is that traditional radiation therapy not only targets the tissue intended, but the nature of that form of radiation is that it travels right through the target-tissue, and irradiates surrounding healthy tissue that does not need to be irradiated. It can cause damage to the bladder, urethra, and rectum, plus lymph nodes depending on where the radiation was focused.
That does NOT happen with Proton Beam therapy. The "radiation" goes "to", but not "through" the target-tissue. Your bladder, urethra, rectum, and other surrounding tissue are not at risk of being irradiated. And...in my initial consultation with an RO, he flat out said that the unfortunate consequence of traditional radiation therapy, is that nearly 100% of men will have urinary incontinence for the rest of their life due to damage and scarring, again, because they can't really control the radiation from irradiating the bladder, urethra, and rectum. And, while low, there is a 1-5% chance of bladder, urethral, or rectal cancer a few to many years later. That's all I needed to know. I will never have traditional radiation therapy, if in fact I need it if/when I experience BCR and enough prostate tissue growth that indicates one or more targeted areas of growth recurrence.