← Return to Salvage surgery or salvage radiation?

Discussion
prettypass2000 avatar

Salvage surgery or salvage radiation?

Prostate Cancer | Last Active: 4 days ago | Replies (44)

Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for prettypass2000 @prettypass2000

@jeffmarc You're right. My husband had prostate surgery as his first treatment. When the chief urologist presented the option of salvage surgery to remove lymph nodes, I found it was odd. I feel that even with the best surgeons, they still can miss the microscopic cells that may not show up on the scan. We've had this experience from his first surgery, which all tests and scans showed no spread. However, they found 0.1 mm of cancer in one of the seminal vesicles during surgery, and it was confirmed in pathology report. That's why I'm very uneasy when surgery was offered again yesterday. I know very tiny trace of cancer can be missed even on PSMA scan. I don't get the idea of putting my husband through misery twice if the salvage surgery fails, and then he would need radiation.

Jump to this post


Replies to "@jeffmarc You're right. My husband had prostate surgery as his first treatment. When the chief urologist..."

@prettypass2000
Interesting definition of salvage radiation. Thanks for bringing it up.

@prettypass2000 Yes, absolutely - NOTHING is going to detect a clump of cells. In fact, someone here on the forum once presented evidence that it has to be a few thousand or so before they will take up adequate tracer and show anything.
Also, this lymph gland dissection is not error free; who can say that more PCa cells won’t be released during retrieval and go elsewhere? Just my point of view, not disparaging your surgeon or his good intentions.
Phil