← Return to Weighing the cancer risk reduction & quality-of-life cost of ADT?

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for soli @soli

@climateguy

If and when I experience BCR, the trade-off between the side-effect burden of ADT and its potential curative benefit will be a major concern for me. In one of his videos, Dr. Kishan—whom I consulted a few weeks ago about his clinical trials—states that ADT improves BCR-free survival from 82% to 85%. In the same video, he also says that for every 8 people treated, 1 benefits.

I understand this to mean that if I undergo ADT, I have only about a 12.5% chance of a very modest improvement in outcomes (an increase from 82% to 85%), but a near-100% chance of experiencing side effects that many people find debilitating. I did briefly raise this concern with both Dr. Kishan and his physiian assistant, but we did not discuss it in detail since I had so many other questions for them, including whether I will be good candidate for MRI-guided SBRT given my pre-existing urinary issues: that is if and when I experience BCR.

Jump to this post


Replies to "@climateguy If and when I experience BCR, the trade-off between the side-effect burden of ADT and..."

@soli

Great comment and several new studies show that ADT treatment only helps a relatively small number of men, but almost all men suffer severe side effects. My side effects were the worst I have read about, and I believe a third dose going beyond 4 months would have killed me. Duke, Harvard and Swedish studies seriously question the effectiveness and safety of taking ADT. They hope to be able to determine how to identify the men that will benefit and restrict ADT to those men only.