The decision I have to make is tearing me up
12 months ago I started going to TRT place for access to peptides.
I got tested and my PSA was 3.7 went through questions about family history with cancer which had none. So I started getting blood work every month and for 7 months my levels went down a little bit but back to 3.7> So got checked and advised prostate was slightly enlarged but due to numbers had biopsy. 1 out of 12 and 3+4 Gleason score was results the 1 was higher up on prostate. Just completed MRI and going in for results in two days. I am really going crazy trying to determine if I really need to have surgery and be done with it or radiation but from reading articles that might be not a good decision. I am 56 yoa and want to get possibly more that 10 more years to play with new grandchild. Not sure if I'm asking to early about what people have done in my position and any regrets, they have for having surgery. GOD speed.
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.
Connect

@jeffmarc Amazing Jeff ! Yes this is what I have been told too, 4-5 years there are so many new therapies and drugs coming . My Doc told me the same thing "your not going to die from this , 20-25 years ago , I could not say that...thats when your dad was going though this. Now and in the future it's a different story . Likely in 4-5 years this disease will be managed for life " . I was so very happy to hear this. He went on about details around DNA and changing it somehow to prevent any progress of PC . Really positive stuff ! have a great night Jeff ! James
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
2 ReactionsWhen the tumor is confined to the prostate and has not spread, focal treatment is an alternative to surgery and radiation. It's not for everyone, but it may be worth you checking out. Here's my story about the Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) Nanoknife treatment for prostate cancer.
The discovery of my prostate cancer began when my PSA had risen from the mid twos to over four. My urologist recommended an MRI of my prostate, which resulted in finding two prostate tumors. The tumors were both contained within the prostate. Next was a biopsy. I chose an ultrasound-guided transperineal biopsy because that type of biopsy uses the MRI information as a road map to make sure the suspected areas are tested. My biopsy showed prostate cancer in the tumors.
Based on my Gleason score of 3+4=7 and a Decipher test showing low risk, I was a candidate for active surveillance. However, one of the tumors abutted the edge of the prostate, so I chose to have the tumors treated. I didn’t want to risk the tumor spreading outside the prostate. I was not excited with the possible side effects of removing the prostate or treating it with radiation, so I did research on focal treatments.
Focal treatments focus on treating prostate cancer by attempting to kill the tumor(s) without removal or radiation. These treatments are not for everyone and seem to require that the cancer has not spread beyond the prostate. There are several types of focal treatment such as High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU), Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation (TULSA Pro), cryotherapy, Irreversible Electroporation (IRE), and others. I chose the IRE Nanoknife treatment which uses electrical current in an attempt to kill the tumor. This treatment was done at Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa by Dr. Julio Powsang.
The IRE Nanoknife procedure went well for me. It took about an hour in total, I'm sure a good part of that was the preparation after I was put under. I think the actual procedure took about 30 minutes.
After the procedure, I had some spasms that were quickly relieved by medication. I had a catheter, which I was a bit concerned about. As it turned out, I had it for six days and didn't have any problems with it. I even removed it myself, which was surprisingly painless. I removed it in the shower so any urine that might have leaked out could be taken care of easily.
After removing the catheter, I had leakage and used pads in my underwear for about six weeks. For the first several weeks, there was blood in the urine, but that eventually cleared up. Sexual function is the same now as before the treatment.
Three months after the procedure my PSA came down from 4.25 to 2.5. Six months after the procedure the PSA was down to 1.53. A multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) was also done at six months and it showed “post ablation changes of the prostate with no new recurrent tumor in the treatment area and no new suspicious lesions in the prostate." My doctor was very pleased with these results and deferred another prostate biopsy for the time being. Another PSA will be done at the one-year mark.
I'm very pleased with the results so far. Best wishes to all seeking a treatment plan best for them. I would highly recommend that everyone consult with a Cancer Center of Excellence. That type of facility is equipped with the specialists, staff and technology which is particularly effective in treating cancer. In addition to Moffitt Cancer Center, which I highly recommend, I have been a patient of Mayo Clinic for many years and have always received the best of care. Both organizations are Cancer Centers of Excellence.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
8 Reactions@jesse65 THAT is a great post, Jesse…I wish all newly diagnosed men could read it!
Phil
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 ReactionAm I reading this correctly that you have 1 pin out of 12 positive with 3+4?
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 Reaction@milburnd Results we would all love to have! Congratulations.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 ReactionI had elevated PSA 3.8 to 4.8 in one year so MRI showed 2 pirad 4 & one pirad 3. Biopsy 2/15 cores one 6 & other 3+4=7. I initially wanted proton, but Drs recommended IMRT. I preferred prostatectomy because lesions are intracapsular & hope of eradication.
I have surgery scheduled, but seeing RT tomorrow for opinion. Prostatectomy ED & incontinence, but radiation possible delayed ED & incontinence, plus urinary, bowel issues & later secondary cancer like bladder cancer.
BCR success rate about same & I wanted radiation to work, but I chose prostatectomy because of bowel, urinary & secondary cancer risks. It is confusing & I may leave RT office tomorrow more confused.
Your doctors will have opinion, but your research will allow decision.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 ReactionYes sir. one out of 12 I go in two days for reading of prostate mri that was done last week. I was told the right side of prostate was larger than left. I did not get decipher and anything else besides Gleason score and I did not know to ask what the percentages were. But I have notes to ask when I go back only because of the information I have received in this forum. Not sure how I came upon this group, but it definitely allows me to take little stress of myself.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
3 Reactions@chippydoo
@jesse65 @dbearb
A Medical Oncologist compares radiation and surgery:
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
2 Reactions@jesse65 What treatment did you end up choosing and what was the final factor that clarified the decision for you?