← Return to RARP vs RT plus ADT for Gleason 8 with cribiform and high Decipher

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for surftohealth88 @surftohealth88

@shelby29

Because radiation with aggressive cancers sometimes does not give full result.

My husband was diagnosed with 4+3 and cribriform and IDC , Decipher 1 , PSA 5.6 before surgery and was recommended by both, the surgeon AND the radiologist, to have RARP as initial treatment.

RO said those words : " You have aggressive cancer and it is best to have "aggressive" approach in those cases and the most aggressive approach is surgery."

After RARP it was discovered that his gleason was actually 4+5 !!! So - if he was treated as having 4+3 which would require just 6-12 mos of ADT and "regular" RT , you can bet it would NOT be successful treatment ! Besides, PSMA is never all telling.

My husband is extremely happy that he had RARP, recovered very fast and is living a normal, very active life, already skiing and hiking full speed and working 3 jobs. If anything was "left" it would be something that is of lower grade and would be easily zapped with RT if necessary since it is not hidden inside the gland and possibly resilient and mutating even further O_O !

Every case is different and aggressive cancers require very specialized approach.

Jump to this post


Replies to "@shelby29 Because radiation with aggressive cancers sometimes does not give full result. My husband was diagnosed..."

@surftohealth88 wow, so good to know...and you are spot on...everyone is different, no cookie cutter treatment. My mayo Rochester docs did not recommend surgery....not 100% sure why. But doing well with the treatment the recommended.

@surftohealth88 thanks for sharing your husband's experience with RARP. That is great that he had a quick recovery, and encouraging for men like me who are trying to decide what primary treatment path to take.