← Return to Is biopsy necessary & effective for detecting prostate cancer?

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for brianjarvis @brianjarvis

Remember that PSA is not a cancer test. (In fact, prostate-specific antigen is not even prostate specific.) The PSA number is similar to a “check engine” light in a car; it indicates that something may be wrong, and further checks should be made “under the hood.” Might be as simple as a UTI; might be BPH; might be more serious, such as prostate cancer. Just need to have further checks.

Also, an MRI doesn’t diagnose prostate cancer. With an MRI, they can provide a probability that “clinically significant cancer is likely/unlikely” and assign those suspicious areas a PIRADS score.

So, that leaves the biopsy —> Taking a sample of those suspicious areas is the only way to definitively diagnose prostate cancer. The TRUS biopsy is the old-fashioned way of doing a prostate biopsy.

> Why aren’t they doing a transperineal prostate biopsy?

Yes, some call prostate biopsies barbaric - but isn’t that the case for every invasive procedure or surgery? I’ve had 2 knee surgeries - are those considered barbaric? I’ve had 1 back surgery - is that considered barbaric? I had my gallbladder removed in 2023 - is that considered barbaric? Basically, there is no logical reason to call a prostate biopsy barbaric and not every other invasive procedure or surgery. Common sense should play a role in all this.

(Note that there are two types of biopsies - tissue biopsies (like you’re talking about) and liquid biopsies. That’s a separate lengthy discussion.)

Diagnosed with prostate cancer in 2012, I had four TRUS biopsies between 2012-2021. For my first TRUS biopsy, I drove myself there and back home. Yes, for my first experience it was quite unnerving, but not terrible or traumatic (with enough Lidocaine!). For my fourth (& final) TRUS biopsy before receiving active treatment, I invited my wife to be in the room where the MRI-guided procedure was being done. I wanted her to see that it wasn’t as painful as she was imagining. She said ok; the urologist said ok. So she sat in the corner of the room (towards my head) during the entire procedure. She’ll probably never get that image out of her head!!!

Jump to this post


Replies to "Remember that PSA is not a cancer test. (In fact, prostate-specific antigen is not even prostate..."

@brianjarvis To me, the barbaric aspect is the fact that it is usually done without general anesthesia (nor spinal anesthesia)...but that's just my opinion.