@rbtsch1951

Thank you for your comment on UCLA's clinic suggesting LiSWT. I agree that this is a good supporting argument for the therapy's possible validity. However, I am not sure if they would also recommend it in post-RALP cases, as well as in cases such as yours.

From my research, I also agree that this therapy seems to be in an experimental phase, with no protocols clearly established and no formal study results published.

Just the fact that nobody in this forum has replied yet to this post with a personal experience is a strong signal about the therapy's low recognition or acceptance for PC patients.