← Return to Has collagen been shown to improve osteopenia symptoms?

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for rjd @rjd

@psanchez33617 This essay is definitely eye-opening and it will be very interesting to hear opinions from others here on Connect about it.
However, statements like 'bone drugs are not beneficial' is possibly as over-generalized as what this article complains about with respect to current treatment practice. It seems to me it is all much more nuanced than what our present health care practices allow or demand.

Jump to this post


Replies to "@psanchez33617 This essay is definitely eye-opening and it will be very interesting to hear opinions from..."

@rjd I stand corrected in my statement that drugs are not beneficial. After assessment and looking closer, this would be more accurate, you might agree-
This article is valid as a discussion piece.
It is not junk science, not misleading in the data it cites, and not outside mainstream medical thinking. It reflects a legitimate and ongoing debate about how much absolute fracture-risk reduction pharmaceutical osteoporosis therapies provide, especially in older adults and in people with differing risk profiles.
Drugs do reduce vertebral fracture risk at the population level.
The absolute benefit is modest.
Whether that benefit is “worth it” depends on the individual — tolerance, fall risk, functional status, and personal priorities.