← Return to No erection after 5 years after radical prostatectomy

Discussion
Amos  avatar

No erection after 5 years after radical prostatectomy

Prostate Cancer | Last Active: Feb 17 10:48am | Replies (47)

Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for brianjarvis @brianjarvis

@rlpostrp The reason is that “having been preserved during the surgery” is medical-speak and can mean different things.

Even the phrase “nerve-sparing” needs to be discussed thoroughly — Is it 100% of both nerve bundles? 100% of one and 0% of the other? 75%/25%? 50/50? 25% of each? 10% of each? Or some other %? Even touching and moving the nerves damages them. The surgeon should have discussed the possibility with you.

Did you specifically have “nerve-sparing surgery?” Or just standard surgery and he would try to save some nerves?

It should be spelled out in the report.

Jump to this post


Replies to "@rlpostrp The reason is that “having been preserved during the surgery” is medical-speak and can mean..."

@brianjarvis My doctor called it nerve sparring surgery...he also said the tactile touch of a human is better than the robotic...in his opinion...but I've never been able to have an erection on my own without a shot