Was on active surveillance, now gleason 3+4: Any advice?
60 year old male gleason 3+4 in one location. psa went from 3.2 to 8.0 in 6 months. been on active surveillance for 2 years for gleason 6 but just turned into 7. any advice?
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.
Connect

@jcf58 Hey JC I just did Hemi gland Tulsa Pro at Mayo Jax. Been seeing Dr Pethak but Dr Dora did my procedure. I’m on 3rd day now dealing with with catheter. My tumor was similar to yours being anterior in the transition zone. Front side of my prostate, PSA maxed out at 4.5, MRI showed 2cm PIRAD 5, biopsy confirmed 1 core 3+4=7 90% 3, PSMA Pet and CT showed no spread. Several things led me to Tulsa Pro including location (interior) and front side side (all important stuff is on the backside), so after researching everything for 9 mos and discussing with Drs at Moffitt and Mayo Jax I pulled the trigger before it was too late. One other thing pushed me towards Tulsa Pro, I did a Prostox test which showed I had a 95% chance of grade level 2 urinary toxicity if I did SBRT which I was considering. Praying all goes well for you and I using this treatment option. No turning back now I guess. I selected this and was ok with about a 5% less chance of cure (95% to 90%) but with practically zero (< 1%) chance of urinary / ED issues, and the ability to do any of the gold standard treatments if re-occurrence happens. I also read that Tulsa essentially eliminates the ability of the cancer eventually metastasizing since it closes off blood flow to area which is required to transport the cancer around your body. I know a lot of people on this forum say Tulsa is not a good option, but I truly believe that it’s only because it is 5-7 years old and doesn’t yet have the history of the others. I’d love to stay in touch with you and your journey. I’m 62 and healthy and active. Thanks.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
4 Reactions@htc929 mine was at Mayo Jax
@brianjarvis thank you for clearing this up for me i appreciate it
@soli The first RO that I ever talked to was a doctor from India that worked for Baylor Scott and White in Temple, TX. I too had a 3+4 case and just like you mentioned in your post this doctor said that 3+4 cancer is highly variable. Rather than say 3+4 is an extremely hetrogenous category, he used the more colorful expression that 3+4 cancer can be a pussy cat or a tiger or anything in between. He said that what we really need to do is perform a genomic test (Decipher) on the cancer cells from the biopsy to really see what we are dealing with.
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
3 Reactions@jcf58
i reached out today to yale medical center today for an appointment for the urology doctor there in charge of the tulsa. I will send them my records tomorow
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
1 Reaction@htc929 Good luck. Don’t hesitate to ask more questions 😉
@wwsmith
Thanks for sharing. Your RO from India is spot on and I do like his colorful languages. I have also seen similar colorful languages - for example - describing the 3+4 cancers of some folks (like me with a Decipher score of .79)) as "wolves in sheep's clothing".
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
3 Reactions@jcf58 At Mayo today and just got catheter out. Boy that was a long 7 days. Anyways hanging out here drinking a lot of water so they can make sure things still work down there. So far so good, went 4 times in 2 hours. Honestly the majority of the pain and discomfort came from the catheter. I had maybe a day or so of lower abdomen pain but now that it’s out all seams good. Looking forward to sleeping on my side tonight
-
Like -
Helpful -
Hug
5 Reactions@bjroc does anyone know the doctor at mayo in jacksonville that does tulsa. just looking for a starting point of where to start
@ucfron
did you do the tulsa at mayo jacksonville. any advice who i can contact