← Return to Would you recommend proton therapy vs surgical removal of prostate?

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for gfeaglefan @gfeaglefan

@seekingclarity
I (61 yo, 3+4=7) too was not sitting well with 2 different urologists recommending removal as best option, I sought an option from a oncology radiologist at Mayo. She would have gladly done SRBT if I wanted it. When talking to her team...the P.A. is male and if he were in my shoes, he would have had a R.P. . My decision came down to not waiting months to years to know if cancer free. I wanted to get rid of the cancer! In the Dr Walsh book, it talks about R.P. as being the gold standard for 100% cure. I had my robotic assisted radical prostatectomy last Wed. Pathology showed progression from 15% of sample as Gleason 4 in June to 70-80% 4s. in Dec When your time comes, RP is a great option that has advanced far beyond the earlier days.

Jump to this post


Replies to "@seekingclarity I (61 yo, 3+4=7) too was not sitting well with 2 different urologists recommending removal..."

@gfeaglefan

Gold standard for 100% cure.
I think not! I have had most of it - not chemo (yet) RP 12 years ago - recurrence then 39 salvage radiation, metastasis recurrence with SBRT, metastasis recurrence with SBRT, PSA this afternoon.

I have no false hopes for being cured

@gfeaglefan I was gleason 3+3. Decided on LARP. Only because I thought it gave me the best chance to be rid of it and I could always have other treatments. Its been 6 years with < .01 PSA. My feeling is I can never call myself cured. I have the PSA done now every 6 months but not going to get over confident.