New research on length of ADT therapy for patients with RT

Posted by ededed @ededed, 4 days ago

Interesting article !!! What I got out of it is that if you take ADT longer than 12 months you may be less likely to die from prostate cancer and more likely to die from other causes. Oh joy !

Here's the article
Original Investigation:
Optimal Duration of Androgen Deprivation Therapy With Definitive Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
A Meta-Analysis
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/article-abstract/2841671

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

Profile picture for northoftheborder @northoftheborder

@chippydoo In many/most countries, doctors don't get paid per visit, so you'd need a different explanation for overtreatment. For example, I'm under the care of my family doctor and my cancer centre. The Ontario government pays my doctor a fixed amount per year for having me on her roster, so she makes the same whether I see her 1x or 20x. The hospital where the cancer centre is located gets baseline funding based on the number of people in the area it serves, and my academic oncologist is likely on salary, so he also doesn't get anything extra for more visits. Yet, to a large extent, we're following the same latest/best practices that you'd see at Mayo, etc. for treating prostate cancer.

@surftohealth88 Perhaps the reason they tend to use overall survival rather than PCa-specific is that many cancer treatments increase the risk of dying from other things (e.g. heart disease, diabetes), so they want to see how the benefits and risks balance out. But it definitely distorts things for younger patients: I mean, there's an elevated chance that an 85-year-old will die of *something* in the next 5 years, with or without prostate cancer, so mixing their overall-survival numbers in with those of people diagnosed in their 40s/50s/60s probably skew things quite a bit.

Jump to this post

@northoftheborder

Yes- it skews picture for younger patients. I think that AI will help with sorting out all of that massive and "collective" data in near future and help with making personalized protocols and plans. : )

REPLY

Yes, genAI will either help refine the data or tell me I'll live to age 512. You never know with AI. 🙂

But I agree with you that it can be a useful tool for spotting trends in massive datasets, as long as there's close expert human supervision and review.

REPLY
Profile picture for northoftheborder @northoftheborder

Yes, genAI will either help refine the data or tell me I'll live to age 512. You never know with AI. 🙂

But I agree with you that it can be a useful tool for spotting trends in massive datasets, as long as there's close expert human supervision and review.

Jump to this post

@northoftheborder

Oh, I am not saying that we should use AI ha ha , no way ! AI will give us at the end what we wish to read and hear if we play with it long enough ! ; ) Unfortunately there is zero education or information for general public about that fact *sigh

I am talking about doctors and researchers using AI for that - same way they use it now for MRI analysis etc. At Stanford they use it to scan mammograms now (I was told that last time I had a mammogram there).

There are big advancements in repurposing old drugs for new treatments and "off label" usage for different conditions for which was no help - AI helped with that. In right hands AI is a fantastic tool, in wrong ones - may lord help us all ....

REPLY
Profile picture for surftohealth88 @surftohealth88

@northoftheborder

Oh, I am not saying that we should use AI ha ha , no way ! AI will give us at the end what we wish to read and hear if we play with it long enough ! ; ) Unfortunately there is zero education or information for general public about that fact *sigh

I am talking about doctors and researchers using AI for that - same way they use it now for MRI analysis etc. At Stanford they use it to scan mammograms now (I was told that last time I had a mammogram there).

There are big advancements in repurposing old drugs for new treatments and "off label" usage for different conditions for which was no help - AI helped with that. In right hands AI is a fantastic tool, in wrong ones - may lord help us all ....

Jump to this post

@surftohealth88 Yes, I understood that in your original comment. Apologies for any confusion caused by the opening joke in my reply.

We're in loud agreement: genAI has the potential to be a powerful tool in the right hands, but never a replacement for human expertise.

REPLY
Profile picture for surftohealth88 @surftohealth88

@chippydoo

I do not understand why I have to "chew" on anything ????

First of all I stated that YES - there probably IS such thing as "over-treatment " (?!)

Second - perhaps try not to jump into conclusions about what I try to say in general ?

Thanks.

Jump to this post

@surftohealth88 Oops I was dialoging with North, my mistake. I try to keep it peer to peer.

REPLY
Profile picture for chippydoo @chippydoo

@surftohealth88 My GU second opinion stated the greatest risk I have at this time is being overtreated. Chew on that. Private practice makes its living on as many visits as they can possibly get out of patients. As my private practice doc said if I allow them to get their blood results through the portal they won't come back. Yeah, come back for a 3 minute appointment if negative for $350. Pointless!

Jump to this post

@chippydoo

Unfortunately, there are built-in financial incentives for over-treatment. That is why I try to use medical professionalies who are salaried, like in major university medical centers. Even there, you have to do your own research, and be your own advocate.

REPLY

My cancer was diagnosed Gleason 7 but Stage 3/4 due to activity in two nearby lymph nodes. I had 44 weekday radiation treatments and was originally prescribed 24 months ADT but it looks like that will be shortened to 18, taking a holiday next June and hopefully not having to resume treatment. I'm 74 and my family isn't known for men lasting much beyond 80. Stroke is popular among my relatives and my cardiologist is monitoring closely. At times, patients have been prescribed 36 months of ADT, but it seems that the longer time isn't significantly superior in outcome to 18 months.

REPLY

Here is a discussion between two medical oncologists, of a presentation by Dr. Nabid, who has studied the effects of ADT for a long time.
https://www.urotoday.com/video-lectures/asco-gu-2023/video/3299-testosterone-recovery-in-patients-with-prostate-cancer-treated-with-radiotherapy-plus-adt-tanya-dorff.html
Eg. " what he showed that was really surprising was with six months of ADT, 75% of men recovered normal testosterone levels, but the median time to recovery was 18 months. And then even more surprising perhaps, with 18 months of ADT, only a quarter of men actually recovered to normal levels and the average time was out as far as five years."

Eg: "And it also I think put some of the radiation ADT trials in a different light in my mind at least, that the expected duration of testosterone suppression and the magnitude of benefit that we imagine with 18 months, with 24 months, it actually might be lifelong castration that's providing some of that benefit, which is a very different decision I think for patients."

Eg.: "we might perhaps be better being honest with our patients to say, "Well, we're going to keep going with the drugs for six months, but you're actually not going to have testosterone recovery for a year and a half."

Nabid's research has indicated that patients who recover testosterone survive longer :
https://ascopost.com/issues/march-25-2025/testosterone-recovery-after-androgen-deprivation-therapy-linked-to-improved-survival-in-high-risk-prostate-cancer/
The two urologists I've seen and the two radiation oncologists all have described ADT side effects to me as not much to be concerned about, saying many of their patients are doing fine....

REPLY
Profile picture for chippydoo @chippydoo

@northoftheborder North I am in the US and we pay by the appointment. More appointments more revenue. Blood work farmed out to a lab and my practice blocks them from giving me my results through my portal so that I have to come in for a $400 3 minute appointment to get a 2 number result 4 times a year. If I BCR again I will be switching from a private practice to a teaching hospital cancer center with a academic provider that is on salary. My wife has received fantastic care there.

To your comment to Surf I feel you are spot on. These drugs don't live rent free inside you . Side effects can take us out eventually. My urology practice won't even discuss that. Another reason to switch to an academic situation with a team approach.

Jump to this post

@chippydoo it is unfair to assume your doctor requires you to visit to get your test results for his personal financial gain. Most of the care that physicians provide is done behind the scenes and not during face to face contact, all of which is time consuming, not to
mention the cognitive skills involved in monitoring patients and working to achieve the best possible outcome. Do you know of any professional who provides services free of charge or do you prefer a physician who is burnt out and under compensated to be providing your care? Most doctors spend an hour behind the scenes for every hour they spend in direct patient care. Many work 12-14 hour days when that extra time is factored in. Furthermore, the face to face encounter provides continuity of care and an opportunity for the provider to make adjustments to a treatment regiment based on observations that can only be encountered in an appointment setting.

If a person is uncomfortable with his/her doctor, then by all means find another provider. But don’t ascribe greed or a lack of compassion to a physician out of that frustration.

Even those countries with national healthcare coverage are not immune to patient frustration, and many who can afford it, have private insurance to allow them to seek care outside of the NHS, so that is not always a panacea.

And lastly, I am one of the first and loudest to encourage patients to seek care at an academic center, but because I believe that is where the best and most up to date treatment protocols are employed and not because the physicians are compensated any differently than those in private practice.

REPLY
Profile picture for climateguy @climateguy

Here is a discussion between two medical oncologists, of a presentation by Dr. Nabid, who has studied the effects of ADT for a long time.
https://www.urotoday.com/video-lectures/asco-gu-2023/video/3299-testosterone-recovery-in-patients-with-prostate-cancer-treated-with-radiotherapy-plus-adt-tanya-dorff.html
Eg. " what he showed that was really surprising was with six months of ADT, 75% of men recovered normal testosterone levels, but the median time to recovery was 18 months. And then even more surprising perhaps, with 18 months of ADT, only a quarter of men actually recovered to normal levels and the average time was out as far as five years."

Eg: "And it also I think put some of the radiation ADT trials in a different light in my mind at least, that the expected duration of testosterone suppression and the magnitude of benefit that we imagine with 18 months, with 24 months, it actually might be lifelong castration that's providing some of that benefit, which is a very different decision I think for patients."

Eg.: "we might perhaps be better being honest with our patients to say, "Well, we're going to keep going with the drugs for six months, but you're actually not going to have testosterone recovery for a year and a half."

Nabid's research has indicated that patients who recover testosterone survive longer :
https://ascopost.com/issues/march-25-2025/testosterone-recovery-after-androgen-deprivation-therapy-linked-to-improved-survival-in-high-risk-prostate-cancer/
The two urologists I've seen and the two radiation oncologists all have described ADT side effects to me as not much to be concerned about, saying many of their patients are doing fine....

Jump to this post

@climateguy Great post! I think a lot of these duration times are prescribed in almost cookbook fashion based on older research.
Wouldn’t a better approach be 6 months ADT (orgovyx)…monitor PSA…6 more months if it ticks higher even after ONE monthly PSA test, etc…rinse and repeat.
I don’t believe that a month or two off ADT while monitoring PSA is going to make a life and death difference.
Phil

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.