What to do? Post RP, Gleason 9, Prostate ductal adenocarcinoma

Posted by sriddle1 @sriddle1, Nov 2 11:59am

Hi,

I am posting on behalf of my partner who is the one that is experiencing all of this.

I will preface this post by the fact that this is all been very fast as he was just diagnosed in August prostate removal surgery 10/17/25.

At the most recent postop visit, we only were met by the nurse practitioner. She briefly went over the pathology report of the surgery. She indicated that what was thought to have been a Gleason score of eight prior to surgery was actually at 9 postop and determined to be ductal in nature and highly aggressive.

My partner at this time is pretty much in denial, not really asking questions nor reading very much. I on the other hand have been ferociously reading, not able to sleep and pretty much losing my mind.

We were told that he needs to come back in six weeks for a PSA blood test. That is all that we were told. His cancer care is being done at City of Hope in Duarte.

In addition to the Gleason score of nine, ductal presentation with crib of form patterns, the report indicated that there was bilateral seminal, vesicle invasion, bladder neck invasion in 2/9 lymph nodes were positive for cancer.

I am basically coming on this chat group to find similar or any helpful recommendations and support.

I guess my question is right now, other than waiting for his PSA blood results in six weeks, what else should we be doing? We are also waiting the results from a PSMA scan that was taken before his surgery and have yet to see results from. He also has not had any genetic testing done at this point.

I apologize for the rambling in the incohesive post.

Thank you in advance for any knowledge, encouragement, or other.

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

Profile picture for sriddle1 @sriddle1

@zash15 hi and thank you so much for taking the time to write such an extensive response to my original post. Wow, it sounds like both your husband and my partner are tracking so similarly. I can only hope to have the luck that you both have had so far I’m sure not without challenges. It gives me a lot of hope to read what you have written. Right now, I am just feel so scared and filled with immense anxiety and fear. Your husband‘s response has me hopeful.

With all those treatments that your husband has had so far, how have they affected him emotionally and physically? Has it just been awful? Or is there a chance that it doesn’t affect everyone quite the same? I am assuming you guys have weighed the pros and cons and had decided to go ahead and do these modalities and have been given such amazing results. This gives me such great hope in lessons, my fear and anxiety immensely. Thank you so much again for sharing your husband’s experience with me.

kindly,

SR

Jump to this post

@sriddle1 Hi, the biggest side effect he dealt with was fatigue. He learned it was okay to absolutely do nothing on some days and take naps as needed. He is working on managing his weight gain. Occasional hot flashes weren’t too bad for him. Emotionally, the knowledge that PC reached a lymph node has been a burden, and he continues to be on an emotional roller coaster, but he has gotten better. We keep reminding ourselves, as others have kindly shared, there are more treatments if needed, and to appreciate where we are in the moment. Best of luck on your journey.

REPLY
Profile picture for Brettiquette @brettiquette

@zash15 thanks for the reply, how is he tolerating it?

Jump to this post

@brettiquette Fatigue was the hardest side effect for him, but he learned to manage it. His blood pressure and weight also increased, but he is hoping to get off the blood pressure mediation now that he is no longer taking Abiraterone. Overall, he tolerated the treatments fairly well.

REPLY
Profile picture for sriddle1 @sriddle1

@surftohealth88 thank you for your reply.

I am feeling more than frustrated with the care I feel he received post op. I was shocked to find out that we were only meeting with a NP for a very important post op visit. She very loosely glazed over the report, had a nurse remove his catheter, told us to make a 6 week appointment for PSA testing and that was that. I must say, I expected more from COH.

He also has been pretty much ignoring or refusing to take an initiative in this process. It’s been mostly left up to me. He seems upset and annoyed that I have been ferocious in my reading and trying to educate ourselves. I feel lost. I feel like we’re just out here trying to figure it out on our own.

We also weren’t given a proper staging of his disease which I think is disingenuous at best. I think had the post op appointment been with the doctor himself with real talk etc., he’d more likely be taking this more seriously.

I am going to request a hard copy of the PSMA scan results and get them into another doctor he has already had a consultation with at UCLA.

Thank you

Jump to this post

@sriddle1 I’m separated from my wife and she doesn’t help at all.

REPLY

Sorry to read of all of this. It sounds pretty ominous with bladder neck invasion, "both" seminal vesicles invaded, Cribriform glands, and lymph node invasion. Did he have a PET Scan prior to surgery? Is that how it was determined that it was in the lymph nodes? Hopefully there was no Gallium-68 uptake in the bones. I hope the surgery included removal of the lymph nodes...it sounds like it did. Sounds like he will go to 40-days-straight of radiation. Was there anything in the pathology report about "surgical margins"? He likely had that since it spread to the seminal vesicles (Extra-prostatic Extension or "EPE"). Surgical margins happen in 10-20% of surgical patients. It means the urologist did not remove "all" of the cancerous tissue, so there is an increased risk of the cancer returning within five years, especially with seminal vesicle invasion. I wish you and your partner good luck. You both might benefit from counseling/therapy understanding what the future will likely be.

REPLY
Profile picture for rlpostrp @rlpostrp

Sorry to read of all of this. It sounds pretty ominous with bladder neck invasion, "both" seminal vesicles invaded, Cribriform glands, and lymph node invasion. Did he have a PET Scan prior to surgery? Is that how it was determined that it was in the lymph nodes? Hopefully there was no Gallium-68 uptake in the bones. I hope the surgery included removal of the lymph nodes...it sounds like it did. Sounds like he will go to 40-days-straight of radiation. Was there anything in the pathology report about "surgical margins"? He likely had that since it spread to the seminal vesicles (Extra-prostatic Extension or "EPE"). Surgical margins happen in 10-20% of surgical patients. It means the urologist did not remove "all" of the cancerous tissue, so there is an increased risk of the cancer returning within five years, especially with seminal vesicle invasion. I wish you and your partner good luck. You both might benefit from counseling/therapy understanding what the future will likely be.

Jump to this post

@rlpostrp

The scan was done prior to the RP and indicated no nodule involvement nor other organ or bones.

It was the surgical pathology that indicated the invasion of 2/9 lymph nodes, SVI, and bladder neck invasion.

The surgeon mentioned that the PSMA scan is only 40% accurate in detection. Absolutely wild.

REPLY

Yes indeed. I have recently written here, that even the Gleason Score is the "small tip of a very large iceberg" lurking below what appears to be "calm waters." I even asked my urologist early on: "Can my lower-Intermediate Risk Gleason Score of 3 + 4 = 7 (only 6-10% of cells were scored "4"), actually misrepresent a much worse status of the cancer?" He said "no...don't worry...we caught your case early." That all changed with the post-RP pathology report. He then said: "it seems that your cancer is a more aggressive form." I was SO ANGRY. I challenged him on what he said before, to which I replied: "I never said that." UNREAL. He also told me that "Prostatectomy is 100% curative." He later said: "I never said that." I said "you most certainly did...where else and why else would I be able to conjure that quote if you never said it?" He gave me the death stare. My life is in his hands, so I will be less assertive going forward.

REPLY
Profile picture for sriddle1 @sriddle1

@rlpostrp

The scan was done prior to the RP and indicated no nodule involvement nor other organ or bones.

It was the surgical pathology that indicated the invasion of 2/9 lymph nodes, SVI, and bladder neck invasion.

The surgeon mentioned that the PSMA scan is only 40% accurate in detection. Absolutely wild.

Jump to this post

@sriddle1

Yes, unfortunately no test shows what is really going on with 100% certainty but knowing that a test is just 40% accurate is really disheartening. PSMA also can show false positives which is also very concerning since false positive can cause unnecessary treatments or over-treatment. Only full examination of removed gland shows actual status of the PC but still not 100%. There could be some micro metastatic clumps of cells that escaped the gland and there is no way to know IF they escaped or WHERE they went. That is why even patients with low gleaoson score and perfect margins still sometimes develop BCR down the road.

You mentioned that you are "stuck on staging" and it is completely understandable - one tries to grasp the extent and meaning of it all and is looking for any positive detail in avalanche of information that was thrown at you. I remember reading 30 scientific papers with average of 10 pages each and than holding onto one single sentence that showed some "positive" data that gave me some hope - we do what we can to stay sane and strong.

You are doing great < 3 . In a very short span of time you learned a lot and managed to be excellent advocate for you partner ! I am sure that he will now get super care and correct PC treatment with your help and will have great results in the end : )

REPLY
Profile picture for rlpostrp @rlpostrp

Yes indeed. I have recently written here, that even the Gleason Score is the "small tip of a very large iceberg" lurking below what appears to be "calm waters." I even asked my urologist early on: "Can my lower-Intermediate Risk Gleason Score of 3 + 4 = 7 (only 6-10% of cells were scored "4"), actually misrepresent a much worse status of the cancer?" He said "no...don't worry...we caught your case early." That all changed with the post-RP pathology report. He then said: "it seems that your cancer is a more aggressive form." I was SO ANGRY. I challenged him on what he said before, to which I replied: "I never said that." UNREAL. He also told me that "Prostatectomy is 100% curative." He later said: "I never said that." I said "you most certainly did...where else and why else would I be able to conjure that quote if you never said it?" He gave me the death stare. My life is in his hands, so I will be less assertive going forward.

Jump to this post

@rlpostrp
When I was only 3+4 after biopsy, my doctor figured that the surgery would cure me. When it showed up to be 4+3 after surgery, they still were not worried. When it came back 3 1/2 years later it was a surprise to them, but they said radiation would be the fix.

It wasn’t until 10 years after surgery that I found out I was BRCA2, So any promises they give would be factually empty.

There are so many different things that can result in the cancer becoming worse, But the doctors like to think they’ve got it, with that next treatment.

REPLY
Profile picture for surftohealth88 @surftohealth88

@sriddle1

Yes, unfortunately no test shows what is really going on with 100% certainty but knowing that a test is just 40% accurate is really disheartening. PSMA also can show false positives which is also very concerning since false positive can cause unnecessary treatments or over-treatment. Only full examination of removed gland shows actual status of the PC but still not 100%. There could be some micro metastatic clumps of cells that escaped the gland and there is no way to know IF they escaped or WHERE they went. That is why even patients with low gleaoson score and perfect margins still sometimes develop BCR down the road.

You mentioned that you are "stuck on staging" and it is completely understandable - one tries to grasp the extent and meaning of it all and is looking for any positive detail in avalanche of information that was thrown at you. I remember reading 30 scientific papers with average of 10 pages each and than holding onto one single sentence that showed some "positive" data that gave me some hope - we do what we can to stay sane and strong.

You are doing great < 3 . In a very short span of time you learned a lot and managed to be excellent advocate for you partner ! I am sure that he will now get super care and correct PC treatment with your help and will have great results in the end : )

Jump to this post

First, we are with you! This group is incredibly supportive. I too post for my husband. He rarely talks about what is going on. He is Gleason 9 which has broken thru the capsule and the cancer is in his seminal vesicles, but no lymph nodes. The urologist after the biopsy would not consider surgery so we just finished a course of radiation, abiraterone + predisone and Zytiga. It is not easy on anyone - you or your husband. Everyone patient is different but it is good to share info. We go to the doctor every 3 months for the same reason: to see if the PSA has elevated. My husband does not like to talk about any of it, and defers to me at the oncologist appointments. It’s ok. I don’t mind at all. So we are on careful watch. With you and your hubby!

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.