← Return to Celiac Artery Dissection (CAD)

Discussion
aas avatar

Celiac Artery Dissection (CAD)

Aortic Aneurysms | Last Active: Jan 3 9:16am | Replies (35)

Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for andytheman @andytheman

UPDATE: 2 years later.
My new cardiovascular surgeon did a complete aortic artery sonogram and he said that I had an aneurysm and it was at 3.9 cm with a tear in it! How can I go from “ I don’t see a torn aneurysm “ to two years later having one of 3.9 cm and torn? It was a different cardiovascular surgeon. As a result I have another meeting next month for another sonogram and then a follow up the following month after that. Why was he able to find it and the other cardiovascular surgeon said he didn’t see any. The one that said he didn’t see any was the one that was mad that I insisted that I have it checked. The one that rushed me through.
If you feel that something is not right and the doctor blows you off seek a second opinion.
Both are cardiovascular surgeons yet I get 2 different opinions. I feel that this new one is more professional and has good bedside manners. The first one who said he didn’t see any was a grouch insulted that I demanded an immediate appointment and not wait a month.

Jump to this post


Replies to "UPDATE: 2 years later. My new cardiovascular surgeon did a complete aortic artery sonogram and he..."

@andytheman

Yes, I completely agree with this. When something seems not right witht the doctor providing you care, get a second opinion. If possible seek care at a tertiary, academic center that has more unusual and complex cases referred to them. When this happens, the doctor gains more special real life experience than other places which would see less unusual cases and not have the exerience to handle them. I would add that ultrasound is good for screening and follow up, but a high quality CT angiogram will usually provide the best evaluation of blood vessels and establish a strong baseline for treatment or followup.