← Return to Why are cancer markers 15-3 and 19-9 rising while CA-125 isn’t?

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for chrissiebee @chrissiebee

@naturegirl5 I also had endometrial cancer with a hysterectomy, Stage 1 , did not penetrate the uterus, and was told never to worry about it again. No chemo, no radiation. Unfortunately to everyone's shock I had a metastasis of it 6.5 years later. The metastasis was attached to my outer colon and hip bone. I had a colon resection and a long course of heavy radiation. The radiation oncologist said it would either cure me or kill me but w/o it, there really wasn't much hope. Radiation was tough because there was a lot of cancer on my hip bone. That was in 2002. I am still alive and doing well. Chemo back then was not suggested because I was told that the chemo back then was not very effective. From the removal of my lymph nodes during surgery, over a decade later I developed lymphedema in my legs. Then in 2021 I developed bladder cancer and was informed it was caused by so much radiation. BTW, I also had breast cancer in 1998 so had radiation then (no chemo). I successfully completed chemo directly into my bladder for a year and am doing fine. Hallelujah! If I had to do it over again, I would choose the same path with no chemo. I understand it's very successful for many. I watched my sister who had Stage IV breast cancer with a year of chemo suffer tremendously and died a year later. I decided that was not a path I wanted to take. Just a personal choice since my first diagnosis was at age 50 and I'm now 80.

Jump to this post


Replies to "@naturegirl5 I also had endometrial cancer with a hysterectomy, Stage 1 , did not penetrate the..."

@chrissiebee Thank you for responding and for your explanation. Your medical history as you recount makes me a little nervous as I think about my next cancer surveillance appointments in December. At that time it will 6.5 years since my initial diagnosis of endometroid adenocarcinoma, Stage 1a and 4.5 years since a recurrence where I had radiation therapy. I often wonder what I will do now (I'm 73-years-old, am healthy and have a good quality of life) if I have another recurrence or a new primary cancer. I suppose I will do the treatment recommended but as I guess closer to 80 years old, maybe not? I guess I really won't know unless those decisions stare me in the face.

So, You are now 80-years-old, 30 years after your first diagnosis at age 50. That's excellent. You are a testimony to how cancer can be treated and a person can live well for many years.