What follows Reclast/Zometa if they are first treatment?
Hi everyone: My breast cancer oncologist has recommended a Reclast infusion now. I have been on an aromatase inhibitor, letrozole, since July and the plan is for me to remain on it for 10 years. Yikes!
Her recommendation is based on my recent Dexa scan showing borderline osteopenia/osteoporosis, my age of 75 and the fact letrozole is terrible for bones.
My endocrinologist said my only options were Prolia followed by Reclast or going straight to the Reclast. I’m too fearful of Prolia to start it at all so it's straight to Reclast. She ruled out anabolics probably based on concerns with them being a risk if you have estrogen-positive breast cancer as I do.
After reconciling myself to the need for Reclast, though, I now wonder what happens in the future. Does starting with Reclast mean you now face a future of Reclast infusions indefinitely? If anabolics are a risk if you have estrogen-positive breast cancer, that rather limits the field! Plus, assuming research might modify anabolic risks, there’s a question about following bisphosphonates with an anabolic since it should be the reverse order.
I would have preferred to stay on strontium citrate which I’d taken for a number of years but had to stop when I developed atrial fibrillation 2 years ago before the breast cancer DX in Oct 2024. Strontium and blood thinners like Eliquis do not play nicely together. In fact, Eliquis does not play nicely with a lot of supplement I used to take.
Anyway, just curious if people have been restricted to Reclast or Zometa infusions and how that has worked for them over time. I’ve read about the possibility of many awful side effects so know about those.
My question is a variation of my earlier post and did get a very helpful response. Will also remind myself to post this on the breast cancer group.
Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Osteoporosis & Bone Health Support Group.
@awfultruth I agree! Waiting 2 years between Dexas is often too long. I have asked my oncologist, my primary care doc and my endocrinology about getting my next Dexa in a year, rather than 2 years. Why? Because I will be having a Reclast infusion, take an aromatase inhibitor, and have osteopenia. All said no. My oncologist, who prescribed the Reclast, is disinclined to go to bat for me on this issue. Perhaps it takes a fracture first.
Medicare, my primary coverage, uses that 2 year rule unless medically necessary. I thought I would meet the standard of "medically necessary." My Dexa from August 2025 shows I am still in osteopenia. My oncologist and physician's assistant said they have gone to bat with Medicare over medical necessity for Dexas in a year rather than 2 year interval. They said they have been unsuccessful so no longer try.
I'd assume the patients they were trying to get coverage for have histories similar to my own. It may be that you have to establish that you have a previous DX of osteoporosis as a minimum.
Like you, I may end up paying out of pocket in a year for a Dexa. The problem is that the majority of my Dexas have all been done at a hospital and I'm sure their charges would be well above $75 here. That would mean using a free-standing facility so would lose the ability to compare scans and not have the same equipment.
Thanks for the info on Jason Health Labs. Will keep that info in mind for future use as well as the notion of self-paying for a Dexa.
@prarysky : I have severe osteoporosis but they still prefer DEXAs every two years. My specialist says that the bones are so slow to change that it is not likely to notice a significant difference in one year, therefore two years is better. I am ok with that. I will get my next Reclast infusion next year.
I haven't had any side effects from the Reclast infusion. My dr says after the second infusion that it is typical to take a break. I forget for how long, but you do not take Reclast indefinitley, he says.
@prarysky
For different situations as previously mentioned here, I do not have any cancers but I had a kidney transplant w Mayo Clinic AZ 7/25/23. and because a known fact of anti rejection meds cause bone loss, Mayo Clinic did bone density scans pre transplant at evaluation time, at transplant time post and at my Dec 2023 at 4 month post check up a bone density scan that showed 71% bone loss since pre transplant due to the anti rejection meds to prevent organ rejection.
My wonderful endocrinologist reviewing what I can / cannot not have w kidney transplant ordered Reclast infusion
to be 3 annuals. I have completed 2 annuals w Aug 2024 the second
and she always has me do a bone density scan week before the second annual Reclast then her visit right after. Bone density scan a yr later after 1st reclast infusion year prior showed no change holding (osteoporosis not worse and I take anti rejection meds for transplant for life.
She recommended % of foods calcium/ vit D etc w supplement dose
Reclast infusions
now done w 2nd annual
NO side affects what's so ever
but instructions before head
drink gallon water day before and after infusion gal water can be hard on kidney ( transpl kidney) I have to drink 3 L a day anyway for kidney transplant
@4corazon Thank you for both of your reassuring comments. I'm happy to know you've had no Reclast side effects! Hurrah! I've read different stories here about Reclast and how long it can be taken. If we're lucky, I hope it stops bone loss without negatively affecting the quality of the existing bone.
@persimmons First of all, hats off to you for getting through so much and maybe being very close to finishing some of the hardest parts of your treatment. Only one more Reclast infusion!
Though I know nothing about your diagnosis, your endocrinologist does indeed sound wonderful. She is proactively monitoring your bone loss with the Dexas annually which definitely seems to be medically necessary for you.
Wishing you the best of health! You are doing great!