← Return to Where are all the people on Active Surveillance (AS)?
DiscussionWhere are all the people on Active Surveillance (AS)?
Prostate Cancer | Last Active: 1 hour ago | Replies (39)Comment receiving replies
Replies to "My comment will be more..."direct". I agreed with my own physician: "Active Surveillance" is a waste..."
I agree 100 %
Thank you for sharing, it sounds like you and your physician made wise treatment decisions for your particular PCa diagnosis.
I also agreed with my urologist and the recommendation of my Decipher GRID report to pursue active surveillance.
As you indicated in your post that you learned “EVERY PROSTATE CANCER IS DIFFERENT”.
I suppose you are familiar with the 2025 NCCN prostate cancer guidelines.
The NCCN’s Early Stage PCa guidelines indicate that active surveillance is preferred for men with GG1 and a viable option for men with GG2.
https://www.nccn.org/patients/guidelines/content/PDF/prostate-early-patient.pdf
Of course, Active Surveillance means one is being regularly monitored for signs of progression, while enjoying a time while all the potential negative side effects of treatment are a non-issue.
I believe the latest estimate is that ~60% of newly diagnosed PCa men are now selecting AS…a clear majority.
In my particular case, I’ve gone a step further and implemented an exercise protocol (ERASE) that has been demonstrated to slow PCa progression via a randomized clinical trial.
I fully understand that some men may have anxiety regarding the idea of harboring any form of “cancer” in their bodies….I get it….I suppose that just doesn’t bother me….and that’s not a putdown on those who may wrestle with this issue…it’s just that I have always looked at life’s challenges as a motivating factor to implement changes that show promise for a favorable outcome. I understand the risks and fully embrace them; especially based on all that I have learned about low risk prostate cancer.
That said, if at some point in the future my PCa progresses to GG3+, then I will select an active treatment action…but meanwhile all the side effects of my PCa “treatment” have been beneficial.
Thanks again for your post! I didn’t think it took on a harsh tone, as you have experienced a difficult set of circumstances and took appropriate treatment actions.
All the best!
@rlpostrp I cant disagree. Exactly what I did. Dr suggested AS on a gleason 6 3+3. I laughed at him and said thats not going to happen. Will insurance pay to take it out and he said sure. The one issue missing in your comment was the mental. My state of mind would have made me sick knowing it was in there growing. I would have gone to emergency for everything. Just knowing I was about to die. I rolled the dice on ED and incontinence. I got them both. but cancer free for 6 years, still healthy, No medications. every 6 month PSA with my blood work. Trimix fixes ED. I wear a clip or a bag for incontinence. I just cant wear shorts .
@rlpostrp
There is quite a controversy about the over treatment of people that have a 3+3 Gleason. In most cases, they should not be treated, Because it isn’t likely they will have it turn into cancer in the future. You have a lot to say about it, but your point of view is not supported by the experts.
Here is a video with Dr. Laurence Klotz, one of the experts on active surveillance. He can give you answers as to why you would or would not be a good candidate for active surveillance.
Here is a video by Dr. Epstein discussing active surveillance and more