← Return to 44yr PSA180 Gleason9 non-metastatic. Surgery or Treatment?
Discussion44yr PSA180 Gleason9 non-metastatic. Surgery or Treatment?
Prostate Cancer | Last Active: Sep 27 11:03am | Replies (112)Comment receiving replies
Replies to "You can add this to my previous offering of advice: Do not start or opt for..."
At UCSF they do radiation on a significant number of people as the first treatment. Rick Davis who started ancan.org Had radiation there 17 years ago. He was a Gleason eight and his cancer never came back. This doctor just puzzles me. Yes, if you are 60 or 50 maybe a prostatectomy makes the most sense, Even if you can never get an erection after it. If you’re in your 70s, then radiation makes a lot more sense since you’ve got a much shorter lifespan. My brother is 79, He was treated with SBRT radiation when he was 75. His PSA has not been rising much and he didn’t have a lot of side effects from the radiation.
The advice that you must have a prostatectomy just makes no sense For people who have minor cases of prostate cancer that can easily be treated.
20 to 40% of patients who have a prostatectomy end up having to have further treatment.
The recurrence rate after SBRT for prostate cancer is generally low, with some studies showing a biochemical failure (a sign of recurrence) in about 20-30% of patients at 2 to 4 years, while other studies report higher cure rates of 95-98% within five years. A specific percentage for patients needing further treatment after SBRT depends on the cancer stage, patient risk factors, and the definition of "recurrence" used in a study
Read about It here
https://ecancer.org/en/news/9170-research-shows-98-percent-cure-rate-for-prostate-cancer-using-sbrt#:~:text=%22The%20current%20form%20of%20radiation,he%20was%20evaluating%20treatment%20options.