← Return to 44yr PSA180 Gleason9 non-metastatic. Surgery or Treatment?

Discussion
dinu avatar

44yr PSA180 Gleason9 non-metastatic. Surgery or Treatment?

Prostate Cancer | Last Active: Sep 27 11:03am | Replies (112)
Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for johndavis60 @johndavis60

Didn’t have decipher. My biopsy, RP pathology and sonomic testing were horrific enough. If I did have decipher it would’ve been over .99. I can only hope they radiate what’s left

Jump to this post

Replies to "Didn’t have decipher. My biopsy, RP pathology and sonomic testing were horrific enough. If I did..."
jeff Marchi | @jeffmarc | Sep 20 12:14am

The problem is there are so many people that I can’t keep track of each symptom. Your profile woke me, a decipher is unnecessary with your situation. Hopefully your treatments will work for long term.

VIEW AND REPLY
rotate | @rotate | Sep 20 9:02pm

I had Gleason 9: 4+5. Everyone expected my Decipher would be high. It came out low risk. That helped me make a critical decision on my care/

The test uses biopsy tissue so nothing is. done to you as long as the biopsy or other pathology tissue was there.

So there's really no downside with Decipher unless you have to pay (it's expensive).

VIEW AND REPLY