← Return to Pancreatic Cancer Group: Introduce yourself and connect with others

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for kakalena @kakalena

My pathology report said my pancreatic adenocarcinoma was acinar. I have had my CA 19-9 levels tested for the past 7 months by 2 different labs and they have been up and down, with a high of 123 to a low of 30.
No one has said anything about it not being an accurate test. ???

Jump to this post


Replies to "My pathology report said my pancreatic adenocarcinoma was acinar. I have had my CA 19-9 levels..."

CA19-9 has never been used as a stand-alone diagnostic test because of a number of pathologies and inflammation causing its elevation. If you have an elevated CA19-9:and acinar, it is likely you have a mixed tumor type with ductal adenocarcinoma. I know of a couple of instances where mixed tumor types were missed on initial morphological examination and when sent to MSKCC for a second review, PDAC was found and the diagnosis changed to mixed PACC and PDAC explaining the presence of an elevated CA19-9.

In those that express CA19-9 with the PDAC form, it can be useful to monitor efficacy of treatment by observing its trend of values. No single point is of value in making a conclusion. It requires several successive measurements.

I have been told and see online that CA19-9 is a general indicator only. My CA 19-9 started >20,000 in late April this year (2025) and dramatically reduced each time tested until reaching a low of 299. Then it has been going back up a bit to 513. My doctor's response was it was trending around 500, again emphasizing the "trend" instead of absolute numbers.