← Return to Update on conflicting surgery recommendations

Discussion
mleiva1234 avatar

Update on conflicting surgery recommendations

Aortic Aneurysms | Last Active: Aug 24 9:16am | Replies (43)

Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for wtamminen @wtamminen

It is great that you did a lot of research. It is always smart to be an informed patient. When I went through this 6 months ago I factored in a couple of other considerations. The first was continuing to live with the constant anxiety of knowing I had an aneurysm that could dissect or rupture even though the risk was small. The second was the future risk. I was 72 and my aneurysm was growing slowly. If it continued to grow at the same rate I probably wouldn’t be at 5.5 cm for another 5 years. At my age every year I waited to have surgery increased the chance of having some of the complications you mentioned. So considering everything I decided to have surgery. My surgery went well and I had no complications and I was out of the hospital in 5 days. It has been 4 months post surgery and I am about 95% recovered (my sternum aches if I do too much). Everyone has to do their own risk assessment and be comfortable with it. I wish everyone the best whatever they decide.

Jump to this post


Replies to "It is great that you did a lot of research. It is always smart to be..."

Thats really great news that your surgery went so well. Congratulations and enjoy. The data says you should live as long (or longer, slightly!) than a 72 year old without an aneurysm. I think the critical factor is growth rate. If it’s stable, terrific. And if it’s growing, probably need surgery. I feared most of all losing some years of vitality to a stroke ( I have a close friend who suffered one at 65 unrelated to aneurysm or surgery and it’s such a tragic loss of activity).
Best wishes for your continued recovery!