← Return to Aquablation: Post-surgery expectations

Discussion
Phil, Alumni Mentor avatar

Aquablation: Post-surgery expectations

Men's Health | Last Active: 12 hours ago | Replies (296)

Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for aapisani5 @aapisani5

The answer is both. Large tissue required an instrument done real time without any type of pain killer; unnerving to say the least. I also pass smaller bits when urinating. It's not continually but very much episodic. A recent MRI shows prostate calcification so believe that's what I am experiencing.
The remaining issue is that following a strenuous run there is substantial blood in the urine. I was put on Finasteride for 6 weeks and have a scheduled meeting with the surgeon the end of this month where they will do a scope. Other than the blood in the urine the aquablation did what it was intended to do; better flow, less awakening at night, less sense of urgency, etc.

Jump to this post


Replies to "The answer is both. Large tissue required an instrument done real time without any type of..."

Further update. Visited aqua surgeon yesterday 8/21 to discuss and scoped to determine why I have significant bleeding after running and also episodic discharge of material when urinating. Prior to visit I had a CT scan of the area. The results of the scan showed calcification of prostate. The scope showed a "garden of stones" which seems to be the culprit in terms of bleeding and discharge following a run. These stones are a result of the healing and is the first time my surgeon has encountered this after aqua. So what to do; three options presented; 1. Do nothing and deal with bleeding and discharge of material haphazardly; 2. Laser the stones which may require a catheter for a short period (the worst part for me); 3. laser the stones and the prostate which should provide more of a guarantee to stop the bleeding. Option 3 will require a longer recovery time. I have a decision to make. Has anyone else experienced this calcification/stones issue?