← Return to Cribriform cells: Does their presence change treatment approach?

Discussion
Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for jeff Marchi @jeffmarc

At that UCSF conference I went to the size of cribriform was a real critical issue. If over 2.5 mm it meant that the Gleason score had a 5 in it even if it was a 3+4

The doctors also mentioned that if somebody has intraductal they almost certainly have Cribriform. Tying the two together more than what do you seem to have heard?

Sure would be helpful if they could do a study that center on people that had cribriform, to see the long-term impact.

Jump to this post


Replies to "At that UCSF conference I went to the size of cribriform was a real critical issue...."

To @bearcat998

A correction to this message. Cribriform has to be over .25 mm to be large. Not 2.5mm