prostatectomy vs radiation?

Posted by lcbc @lcbc, Jul 10 10:18am

Seeing radiation oncologist Monday
Surgeon says I am okay for prostatectomy, although age is a bit of
concern, parents lived til mid 90s

CHOICES? Quality of life/ killing cancer
Age 75, good health, active pickle ball, mountain bike
Diagnosed two weeks ago, Gleason 7 (4+3), stage 2C
unfavorable intermediate risk
12 of 15 cores were cancerous,
PSMA, contained in Prostate

Any advice and your experiences are helpful ….thanks.
Also SBRT vs longer radiation sessions with these stats?

Interested in more discussions like this? Go to the Prostate Cancer Support Group.

@brianjarvis

I chose to use a data-driven approach to select a treatment.
> Data indicate that recurrence rates comparing surgery vs radiation are statistically equivalent (https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2214122), so choose the one that causes the least harm.

> Dr. Kwon (of Mayo Clinic) mentions similar numbers, the only difference being where recurrence occurs (https://youtu.be/Q2joD360_pI).

> As for pathology grade matching needle biopsy grade (though results vary slightly study-to-study), this 2019 paper out of the UK indicated that initial biopsy and pathological grade matched 59% of the time, while upgrades occurred 25% of the time and downgrades occurred 15% of the time: https://bmcurol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12894-019-0526-9

Yes, surgery does offer better analysis of the tissue - after the fact (the numbers are similar or better 75% of the time in that study). And with all the scans, tests, liquid biopsy, genetic, genomic, and many more, sufficient data can be gathered for a good treatment plan without cutting off an appendage “just to see.”

I just think that with today’s modern radiation technologies (which continually improve) along with adjuvant therapies, there is no longer a documented need to remove that body part.

But, that’s what’s great about having treatment choices. We each get to choose the one that suits us the best and then we each get to live with that decision.

Jump to this post

For cribriform and IDC stats and studies show advantage with RP.

For us keeping a "diseased gland" had no appeal, especially with aggressive elements that might evade radiation and became even MORE aggressive mutants , as per study I already attached.

REPLY
@rlpostrp

I won't actually know until my next post-surgical follow-up appointment, 7/31. I've actually pondered - without any action taken - as to why my doctor didn't move up my follow-up appointment to the week following my last appointment on April 28th? Maybe again, because prostate cancer grows so slowly, that my doctor knows that seeing him 3-months after my last appointment won't make a difference. Are there any doctors out there reading this, who want to weigh-in here? If you have a post-surgical radical prostatectomy patient who was revealed to be a pT3b level patient based on the pathology report, would you do as my doctor did, saying: "We'll need to talk about radiation during your next appointment" and wait those three months? Or...would you walk me up to the front receptionist, and say: "Schedule this patient sometime next week...make it work, fit him in." ??? What would you do?

Jump to this post

I am sorry I can not be of much help since I am not a doctor but I just want to say that I read couple of time here on this forum that a body needs first to heal from surgery so that it can endure radiation treatments which many times are no walk in the park either. However I completely get your frustration - my husband had to wait for every singe test and every single consultations for weeks and weeks. He was diagnosed with cancer in February and will have surgery next month ...

REPLY
@bens1

@lcbc

I was 69 when I had 5 radiation treatments with the MRIdian linac which had a built in MRI so the margins of radiation exposure to healthy tissue, which impacts side effects and quality of life, outside the prostate, were 2 mm instead of 3-5 mm for most other radiation machines. The Elekta Unity is the only other machine that I know of that has a built in MRI. What they see, in real time, they can treat.

My side effects were limited to a slight reduction in urination after my third treatment, which Flomax took care of overnight. I had no pain, no bleeding in the rectum and was still able to have erections and orgasms shortly thereafter.

That was in February in 2023 and before treatment I had a PSA of 11.2 and a Gleason of 3+4: Low risk decipher. I did have spaceoar. Still all good today. I would do it the same way today except maybe a different type of biopsy.

Multiple opinions from centers of excellence or those trained at centers of excellence was also helpful.

Jump to this post

Regarding MRILinac procedure: Since FEB of 23, how is your urinary function, bowel impact, and erectile performance? Thanks,

REPLY

@tjp1958
My urinary function is normal. I never had any issue with my rectum or bowel movements. Other than a slight difference in how hard my erection is, everything is working fine. I never really had any side effects except a slight restriction after my third radiation treatment, which Flomax took care of pretty quickly.

REPLY
@bens1

@tjp1958
My urinary function is normal. I never had any issue with my rectum or bowel movements. Other than a slight difference in how hard my erection is, everything is working fine. I never really had any side effects except a slight restriction after my third radiation treatment, which Flomax took care of pretty quickly.

Jump to this post

Thx! Any cialis, viagra now or have you considered it for hardness?

Also, did they use a gel barrier (spaceoar) between rectum and prostate?

Finally, any ADT (hormone therapy) before, during or after treatments?

REPLY
@tjp1958

Thx! Any cialis, viagra now or have you considered it for hardness?

Also, did they use a gel barrier (spaceoar) between rectum and prostate?

Finally, any ADT (hormone therapy) before, during or after treatments?

Jump to this post

@tjp1958

No real need for the little blue pill or the like.

I did have spaceoar inserted.

No adt treatment at all.

REPLY

This is SO HELPFUL to me! Thank you! 🙏🏻Could you please summarize your conditions going in? PSA, Gleason, MRI results, biopsy results, age, physical condition going in,

Why chose you MRILinac (or otherwise known as SMART? )
Also recovery experience - during 5 fractions and short term after, then Long term after?

Thx so much! 😊

REPLY

@lcbc
Lot of questions. I had 30 rounds of proton radiation. Why? Both R/Os as UFHPTI and Mayo Jacksonville believed the low dose long term treatments were in my best interest.

I post this because the decision to go with low dose extended treatments and high dose short time of treatments should be a personal decision. The low dose long term from my PCP recently is showing some difference in the degree of side affects from those getting high dose short term. You would expect this though from getting a high does you would get side affects sooner that with the low dose (my personal opinion not a medical opinion).

Did your urologist go over the difference in photon and proton radiation? On RP I did not have so will not comment. I was 76 when diagnosed and have heart failure so was not an option for me nor would I have chose in with my dignosis of low risk from Decipher test.

I don't see you havign a Decipher test but you did get PSMA. Asked your doctors about getting a Decipher test. Most of the time they can use the same biopsies taken to do the test. Decipher test will give you and your doctors a more precise diagnosis of the risk level of your cancer. That makes a huge differences in what treatments can and will be offered to you to consider.

REPLY

Thanks for the info. Surgeon and RO were great in going over pros and cons. Going with radiation, waiting for Arterra pathology test results before deciding on ADT. No SBRT due to UIRisk status. 28 sessions and hoping no ADT is needed first, but not counting on it.

REPLY

I am 64, and was diagnosed in late March 2025 with Gleason 4+3, Cribriform pattern and unfavourable intermediate risk. A PSMA MRI Scan in January detected a 1.1 cm lesion with a gross extraprostatic extension on the left side of my prostate that could not be detected by a DRE or ultrasound. The biopsy found cancer in all four cores from the lesion, but not in the other 12 cores. A PSMA PET Scan found no evidence of metastasis. I am also fit, overwise healthy and am an avid mountain biker and cross country skier. I used to play squash competitively, and some of my old squash buddies are now pickleball players, but I haven't tried it yet.

Armed with all this information, I started my research. I read everything I could find from reputable sources. As part of my research, I also travelled down to the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville Florida (from Alberta Canada) to have consults with a Urologist (surgeon) and a Radiation Oncologist. Each consult included a resident in addition to the specialist that I booked with. I also spoke to two different urologists here in Alberta. In total, I spoke with four urologists and two radiation oncologists. For my situation, all six doctors agreed that radiation and a RARP were good options that would have a good prognosis. All six doctors also told me that in my specific situation, they would opt for the RARP. The urologists were concerned that radiation would preclude the option of surgery later on. The one surgeon said that if cancer re-occurs after a prostatectomy that it is often localized and follow-up surgery can be an option in this circumstance. The radiation oncologists said they would opt for surgery because of the negative side effects of hormone therapy that would be required after radiation.

One of the urologists I spoke to was the son of a family friend who specializes in helping patients who have complications post treatment for a broad range of prostate issues including cancer survivors who have undergone prostatectomies and radiation treatments. He told me with surgery you get the bad stuff over with up front, but with radiation the side effects tend to show up ten years plus or minus down the road. He told me that if his dad was my age and in good health, he would advise him to have surgery. If his dad was 80 then he would advise to have radiation. The primary determinants were health (able to handle the rigours of surgery, age (likelihood of living long enough to experience the delayed effects of radiation) and no evidence of metastasis.

Your situation and mine have some similarities (health and fitness) and differences (age). I am glad that you are also speaking to a radiation oncologist. Ask a lot of questions about side effects of hormone therapy that I was told can linger for months or years after therapy is finished, as well as the potential for longer term side effects.

I wish you well with your journey and in making the right decision for you. FYI, I had my surgery (RARP) on Monday, July 14th, and I am writing this comment on day three of my recovery with my foley catheter bag at my side.

REPLY
Please sign in or register to post a reply.