Exactly, you summed it up well! Ideally, your case is best managed via interdisciplinary collaboration, where specialists work together to evaluate the risks of each drug in the context of your specific medical conditions.
I started HRT at 61, 11 years post menopause. The decision is now described as "individualized assessment and shared decision-making process". I wonder if your endo's take on HRT was based on your Tscore and/or FRAX score. In my view, your endo is the one to determine whether HRT is the appropriate agent in managing your osteoporosis, while your cardiologist and obgyn are best suited to assess the potential risks for you.
HRT is generally used as an antiresorptive but is not officially indicated for treatment for severe osteoporosis. It can improve bmd to a certain extent, particularly during the first two years of therapy. So, if you are aiming for significant bmd gains in the near future, your original question still stands, a challenging one, indeed.
Hi, @mayblin. My endo's refusal re: HRT had to do with the fact that I am past the prescribed 10 years past menopause and also am a supposed cardiac/clotting risk. She goes by the book, end of story. I was asking her about HRT only as an adjunct to my next osteoporosis drug because hip-wise, I did so poorly on Tymlos and figured I could use all the ammunition I could get!
Yesterday, I received a note from my cardio's PA saying my cardiologist would look further into the Evenity issue for me and "possibly" be willing to get in touch with my contact at Amgen. I actually spent a few hours crafting a couple of very concise portal replies with a summary of my concerns and questions. Here's hoping I get somewhere. I am technically running out of time: My rheumy has messaged me that one can lost bone density within weeks of going off Tymlos! So there's an answer to that question... though it's not the answer I wanted to hear!