← Return to Conflicting options - should I get a third?

Discussion
phbphd1992 avatar

Conflicting options - should I get a third?

Prostate Cancer | Last Active: Jun 28 5:12pm | Replies (26)

Comment receiving replies
Profile picture for robertov @robertov

I don’t understand why your urologist was so quick to want to remove the prostate. Removing it has life-long repercussions. Anything you do will have repercussions, so thoughtful research should be in order. If you haven’t had a PSMA Pet scan that is necessary! It tells you if any cancer has metastasized. Without that you can’t make a decision.

I thought you wrote Gleason 6 and later revised it? If 6, I’m with your oncologist who recommends AS. Even one of the commenters said her husband was on AS for 10 years. That’s 10 good years. And according to what I’ve read, his more recent diagnosis is probably an entirely different cancer that developed.

Jump to this post


Replies to "I don’t understand why your urologist was so quick to want to remove the prostate. Removing..."

Nope, it is not different cancer - how did you make that conclusion ?

It is 3+3 that continued to change (as all cancer cells change over time) and accumulated more and more mutations that resulted in cells becoming cribriform in appearance.

Regarding "10 good years", we consider them "10 years living in ignorance" and trusting incompetent doctor ! Besides, there is no reason that my husband will not have 10 more good years after RP (???!!). If anything, we wish that he had RP earlier *sigh.