← Return to Rare cancer: ovarian clear cell carcinoma

Discussion

Rare cancer: ovarian clear cell carcinoma

Gynecologic Cancers | Last Active: 1 day ago | Replies (170)

Comment receiving replies
@jchantler

Thank you for sharing your journey and the helpful links. Love the foreign travel. Up yours, cancer! You go girl. Carpe Diem!
If you are dmmr have you seen the big news article from Sloan Kettering that was in the New England Journal of Medicine? It was on regular news outlets, too. The problem with the mismatch repair allowed the drug to target and strip cancer cells of protection and be DESTROYED. Here's the article . Dostarlimab is the drug they used.
The New England Journal of Medicine published a paper on April 27, 2025, that presents exciting new results from a clinical trial led by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) gastrointestinal oncologists Andrea Cercek, MD, and Luis Diaz Jr., MD, that demonstrates how immunotherapy alone can help patients with MMRd cancers avoid surgery and preserve their quality of life. The results, presented simultaneously at the 2025 American Association of Cancer Research (AACR) Annual Meeting, showed that 80% of patients with several types of cancer treated with immunotherapy did not require surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy after six months of treatment with immunotherapy alone. Swim Across America awarded grants for the early-stage research and continues to award grants for the ongoing clinical trial.

Andrea Cercek, M.D., gastrointestinal oncologist and co-director of the Center for Young Onset Colorectal and Gastrointestinal Cancer at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd) in cancer refers to a situation where tumor cells have defective mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, essential for correcting DNA errors during cell replication. This deficiency leads to the accumulation of mutations, including microsatellite instability (MSI), making tumors more prone to be recognized by the immune system. MMRd status is a significant factor in cancer treatment, particularly for immunotherapy, as it can predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

The standard of care for many cancers that have this specific MMRd genetic mutation has been surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Still, the patients who responded positively to this clinical trial did not require surgery to remove an organ and did not experience chemotherapy or radiation, which improved their quality of life. This trial is the first time that immunotherapy has been shown to replace surgery for a variety of solid tumors.

“This study shows that immunotherapy can replace surgery, radiation and chemotherapy for mismatch repair-deficient solid tumors, which could help patients preserve their organs and avoid the harsh side effects of chemo and radiation,” said Andrea Cercek, M.D., gastrointestinal oncologist and co-director of the Center for Young Onset Colorectal and Gastrointestinal Cancer at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. “Preserving a patient’s quality of life, while also successfully achieving positive results in eliminating their cancer, is the best possible outcome. They can return to their daily routines and maintain their independence.”

Luis Diaz, M.D., gastrointestinal oncologist and Head of the Division of Solid Tumor Oncology at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
This phase 2 trial is an extension of a groundbreaking study, also funded in part by Swim Across America, in which all rectal cancer patients treated with the immunotherapy dostarlimab experienced a complete clinical response, meaning their tumors disappeared. This was the first time ever that a clinical trial had a 100% positive response rate.

Jump to this post


Replies to "Thank you for sharing your journey and the helpful links. Love the foreign travel. Up yours,..."

This is great news for many women with aggressive cancers. Sadly, my biomarker report card says that I’m proficient, but maybe there will soon be something equally hopeful for me and my sisters soon.

thanks, i read reports of the study on jemperli and wanted to switch to it. asked my oncologist plus the second opinion doc at mayo phoenix. apparently i am pMMR though so they thought Herceptin was the better of the two. i was very impressed with the study results, however. the thing that bothers me is that i've had two medical people say, from looking at a very bad pre-surgery CT-scan and a clean one done post-fifth infusion, that it is obvious that the chemo is working. that seems like very bad logic - it seems to me that it means that either the surgery or the chemo is working. seems bad for them to base a treatment plan on bad logic. unless if i hadn't had the chemo, i would have metastasized by the second ct-scan BUT THEN WHY DIDN'T THEY SAY THAT WHEN I WAS TRYING TO DECIDE ON WHETHER TO DO CHEMO OR NOT????? these doctors are shifty little creatures -- JUST GIVE ME THE DATA!